Itās an old wiveās tale to change the oil at 1K or 2K miles and has been so for over 25 years. But, habits die hard in America based on the sour memories of auto quality of the 60ās - early 90ās.
Basically, thereās nothing bad with doing it. Yet, thereās nothing good in early oil changes either.
Modern auto engineering is at its peak and the efficiency of these engines should be without question, but many have debated this here in many threads.
Only thing Iāll say about oil is that your/my Bronco came with a synthetic blend; Iād recommend full synthetic and Motorcraft is very good oil, period. If doing your own, may as well go with Amsoil which is basically nectar from the Gods!
That my friend, is about the best way Iāve ever seen this put. Thatās a winning analogy if Iāve ever seen one.
Imagine if you will, 3 different people leading ordinary lives driving the exact same vehicle over 10 years. Each person trades in their car with 250,000 miles on the odometer. They each get $2,500 trade-in. Person A is a member of an online automotive forum and is an automotive enthusiast. He changes his oil religiously every 3,000 miles @$50 for a total cost of $4,166. Person B loves his car and follows the manufacturers recommended oil change schedule of 10,000 miles @$50 for a total of $1,250. Person C only sees his vehicle as a way to get from point A to B and only changes his oil when he thinks about it for a total of 12 times @$50 for a total cost of $600.
Now, before you discount my little thought experiment this morning; I'll bet we all know a few person C's with cars with high miles. You scratch your head and ask yourself, how in the hell is that car still running down the road?
Now mind you, I'm in the 5,000 mile group. So Ray, we have to ask ourselves who are the idiots here?
Let me put this is perspective. The eco engines are high compression with turbo charger(s).. The cartridge ecos have very limited filtering capacity.. Rule 20 years ago with turbo engines was 3000 miles max.. Yes, engine designs have āimprovedā and so has synthetic oil (even Amsoil) but high compression and turbo charging blows combustion products by even these modern piston rings.. Those āproductsā contaminate your oil then get circulated through the engine.. I put bypass oil filters on every vehicle I own.. Get the <20 micron garbage that best āfiltersā canāt capture.. I have a 2.3L (bronco) and a 3.0L twin turbo (Explorer ST) with a old Frantz filter.. Both have 3000 miles.. ST gets run hard.. Bronco oil is black, ST oil is only now get dirty ( see photo).. Frantz take oil down to 1 Micro.. Thatās how clean oil circulating in your engine SHOULD be.. Been doing these comparisons for ten years. All the different engines I applied bypass to are still running.. Amsoil makes a 2 micro filter, and the current Frantz ātoliet paperā Elements are advertised at 2 microns .. Amsoil is a screw on canister, Frantz is a dirty change anyway you look at it.. Picture is 3500 miles on Eco 3.0L with Frantz..3-5 whether you're running full syn or syn blend. I know some will disagree but this is Ford's opinion, not my own. We're asking more of our lubricants now that these engines are turbo charged and direct injected. Oil lubes the turbo bearings as well as all of the other internal moving parts. Want to kill your timing chain tensioners and VCTs faster? Don't keep up on your maintenance. The filter cartridges on these can only remove so much "crap" so once that happens you're either bypassing or the stuff going through the filter won't be as clean. Since conventional oil pretty much phased out of use by Ford, the filter has become the limiting factor to extending intervals (my opinion).
That's much better than I would've expected for 3500. I guess moral of the story is trying to stretch or go 7500 like Ford claims in their maintenance guide is great for cost of ownership stats but not optimal for everyone. I do a bunch of short tripping so it may be 6 months or more before I get 3000 so I try to do them in the 3000-4000 range. Me along with most of my techs feel doing them on the low side of the range is better long term than what little money you save by trying to push them out past 5000.Let me put this is perspective. The eco engines are high compression with turbo charger(s).. The cartridge ecos have very limited filtering capacity.. Rule 20 years ago with turbo engines was 3000 miles max.. Yes, engine designs have āimprovedā and so has synthetic oil (even Amsoil) but high compression and turbo charging blows combustion products by even these modern piston rings.. Those āproductsā contaminate your oil then get circulated through the engine.. I put bypass oil filters on every vehicle I own.. Get the <20 micron garbage that best āfiltersā canāt capture.. I have a 2.3L (bronco) and a 3.0L twin turbo (Explorer ST) with a old Frantz filter.. Both have 3000 miles.. ST gets run hard.. Bronco oil is black, ST oil is only now get dirty ( see photo).. Frantz take oil down to 1 Micro.. Thatās how clean oil circulating in your engine SHOULD be.. Been doing these comparisons for ten years. All the different engines I applied bypass to are still running.. Amsoil makes a 2 micro filter, and the current Frantz ātoliet paperā Elements are advertised at 2 microns .. Amsoil is a screw on canister, Frantz is a dirty change anyway you look at it.. Picture is 3500 miles on Eco 3.0L with Frantz..
The only downside would be the cost of the oil change. Iāve driven my vehicles for a couple million miles and Iāve never had a mechanical failure or needed repair and Iāve always changed my oil early and often. My dealership does them for 55 bucks including everything so itās almost free compared to the cost of engine issues in the future.Is it worthwhile to get an oil change at the first 2k or wait till the 7k mark?
You will get some fuel dilution until the rings seat and with a turbo you always see heavier fuel dilution for the first few thousand miles than you would with a normally asperated engine.Here are some data points from the UOA that I did on the first oil change in my Wildtrak. This was 1,000 miles--ALL highway and not hammering it. I drive very conservatively for the first 1K miles to allow for a proper break-in.
In 1,000 miles the viscosity had dropped from a 5W-30 to an xW-20. Fuel dilution was already at 2.5% under operating conditions that should have seen the LEAST amount of fuel dilution.
Imagine what the viscosity had been if I had done (as most do) and wait until the iOLM said to change the oil. Do you really want a high-output twin turbocharged engine running on xW-20 oil?
I say change fluids early and often in the first 10K miles of a vehicles life to get the wear metals out and limit viscosity issues.
Agree to a point, but Ecoboost engines are Direct Injected so they are going to suffer from fuel dilution regardless and it will "always" be an issue. With that said, it also does not help the situation when a new owner waits 5K miles (or longer) to change the oil for the first time.You will get some fuel dilution until the rings seat and with a turbo you always see heavier fuel dilution for the first few thousand miles than you would with a normally asperated engine.
thanks for that data. I changed mine at 1368 miles. I was waiting for my UPR plug to come in. But Iāll do an oil analysis on the next change at 5k. Put QS Ultimate Durability 5w-30 in. I used Supertech Full syn on my 2.7 F150 and the oil analysis on that was good at 5k but wouldnāt have pushed it past 6k. Iām hoping this oil is a tad better but if itās good at 5k Iām fine with that. But even on my 2.7 with over 35k miles there was definitely a good amount of Fuel in the oil. So itās not that it was breaking in like mentioned below your post when the data.Here are some data points from the UOA that I did on the first oil change in my Wildtrak. This was 1,000 miles--ALL highway and not hammering it. I drive very conservatively for the first 1K miles to allow for a proper break-in.
In 1,000 miles the viscosity had dropped from a 5W-30 to an xW-20. Fuel dilution was already at 2.5% under operating conditions that should have seen the LEAST amount of fuel dilution.
Imagine what the viscosity had been if I had done (as most do) and wait until the iOLM said to change the oil. Do you really want a high-output twin turbocharged engine running on xW-20 oil?
I say change fluids early and often in the first 10K miles of a vehicles life to get the wear metals out and limit viscosity issues.
True that, pouring fuel into a cylinder is not the best for the oil covering the cylinder walls as opposed to an atomized air/fuel mixture entering the via the port.Agree to a point, but Ecoboost engines are Direct Injected so they are going to suffer from fuel dilution regardless and it will "always" be an issue.