Agreed. I've driven manual Wranglers for the past 25 years pretty much exclusively. I like naturally-aspirated engines, especially the 4L inline with all that low-end torque. But the Bronco 2.3L with the manual, in a lighter 2-door with 32's, was MUCH quicker and lots more tossible. Reaching 60MPH in 6.5 seconds is something a Wrangler with a Pentastar can never do! I'm anxious to see what the Big Bend will do with the Ford Performance tune and a rear seat delete. Also, getting just under 22MPG, which is roughly equivalent to the JK's best return.Your clearly know your stuff. Good commentary about manuals!
I'm a die hard manual driver myself. It's just more fun for me and I like banging gears. I've been driving manuals since 1999. I learned to drive on an 83' Datsun pickup in a Big Lots parking lot while my dad shouted at me to quit killing the engine.
I love my wife's WRX (2021 MT) and she also used to have a 14 WRX hatch (MT).
I currently have a 21' Wrangler Rubicon with 6 speed MT and Ive truly enjoyed it, I've had a lot of fun taking it off road and it's truly a beast from the factory.
I got sick of the way it drives, saw a Heritage edition and went "Need that", test drove a Bronco and was shocked by how well it felt by comparison on the road. Power is more present and punchy. On the Jeep when you goose the throttle there's a slight delay and then it lurches forward. It's no slouch, but the Bronco turbo gives a nice push at RPM that the Jeep lacks. I've had wranglers as off road toys for 15 years-TJ, JK, JL and enjoyed the heck out of them.
Looking forward to my getting my MT Bronco.
I learned to drive on a 1967 Ford pickup. My first car was a 1964 GTO with a four-speed, over 50 years ago now, and this Bronco would surely have given the goat a run for the money. This is amazing, because my first 2.3L produced only 92 horsepower and 121 lb⋅ft of torque in 1975.
Do you know the rear end axle ratio on your new Bronco?
Sponsored