Sponsored
+193 RWHP dyno by 2023 Bronco Raptor w/ ZFG Racing 93 Octane and E50 Custom Tune
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2020
- Threads
- 21
- Messages
- 1,926
- Reaction score
- 6,922
- Location
- Republic of Texas
- Vehicle(s)
- Raptor
- Your Bronco Model
- Raptor
I'll be making a post within the next few days with dragy times to compare stock vs 93 vs e50 if you're wanting to know about times.
This is my daily so I put miles on it every day and haven't had any issues.
Any new updates? Looking forward to what your mods are and any draggy times you have.
Sponsored
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2020
- Threads
- 21
- Messages
- 1,926
- Reaction score
- 6,922
- Location
- Republic of Texas
- Vehicle(s)
- Raptor
- Your Bronco Model
- Raptor
This is my best time so far on the 93 tune. Wasn't able to get video to work (which I now know why) so I'll get a video soon of a run. I believe stock they run 14.3-14.4.
Math checks out with racing calculator too which I've used in the past to guesstimate
Math checks out with racing calculator too which I've used in the past to guesstimate
Last edited:
Yes, but the left side turbo won’t work without completely changing the
It has a different style compressor housing.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2021
- Threads
- 32
- Messages
- 699
- Reaction score
- 1,508
- Location
- North Carolina
- Vehicle(s)
- 2022 - BB Sasquatch - Mid - 2.7L
- Your Bronco Model
- Big Bend
That calculator is based on crank HP, not WHP. Doesn't your Bronco make 490 WHP w/the 93 tune? I would think with the stock 37" BFGs, you'd be dipping into the 12's.This is my best time so far on the 93 tune. Wasn't able to get video to work (which I now know why) so I'll get a video soon of a run. I believe stock they run 14.3-14.4.
Math checks out with racing calculator too which I've used in the past to guesstimate
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2020
- Threads
- 21
- Messages
- 1,926
- Reaction score
- 6,922
- Location
- Republic of Texas
- Vehicle(s)
- Raptor
- Your Bronco Model
- Raptor
hmm it sure is. It's been accurate for me with past vehicles which is weird. Using whp and another calc, ET checks out, but no trap. I do think with the factory 37's it would be 12.99 capable. These are almost 20lbs a piece heavier and have a slightly larger OD. stiff sidewalls hurt traction. too. I didn't see any difference using the rear locker either or with the coilovers in the softest or stiffest setting
Sponsored
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2021
- Threads
- 32
- Messages
- 699
- Reaction score
- 1,508
- Location
- North Carolina
- Vehicle(s)
- 2022 - BB Sasquatch - Mid - 2.7L
- Your Bronco Model
- Big Bend
20 lbs. extra on each corner is a lot, so you'd definitely be in the 12's with the stock tireshmm it sure is. It's been accurate for me with past vehicles which is weird. Using whp and another calc, ET checks out, but no trap. I do think with the factory 37's it would be 12.99 capable. These are almost 20lbs a piece heavier and have a slightly larger OD. stiff sidewalls hurt traction. too. I didn't see any difference using the rear locker either or with the coilovers in the softest or stiffest setting
@Ducati1098 went from his heavy 37's back to the stock 35" sasquatch tires and dropped half a sec on his 1/4 mile time IIRC. With the E50 tune loaded, she's Definitely in the 12's with your current setup. Congrats! She's a monster
Got it! so source turbos and charge pipes and it would be in business... maybe i will tackle that once my powertrain warranty is up.
Yep. Here is the difference I was referring to. The 2.7 has a plastic elbow that bolts onto the inlet of the compressor housing, while the 3.0 just has a normal tube that gets clamped on.
ah ok, so its the intake tubing that needs swapped rather than charge piping, either way You rock. thank you for the information!Yep. Here is the difference I was referring to. The 2.7 has a plastic elbow that bolts onto the inlet of the compressor housing, while the 3.0 just has a normal tube that gets clamped on.
Yes, correct.
Sponsored
Similar threads
