Search results

Yeah 230 oil temperature wouldn’t cause a reduced power message. Whatever caused that should’ve set a code though, even if it didn’t set a check engine light. There’s no way to see the coolant temp on stock cluster, you’d have to use something aftermarket plugged into the OBD2 port that reads data.

I made 396/470 with stage 3 CRP turbos on 93 Similar compressor size, but still a stock turbine size unlike the Garrett turbos. Stock with only some bolt ons I made 278/352, so that's +121whp/+118wtq The Garrett turbos should be able to make a little more. E85 is where everything really wakes...

Correct. Once it has been used, it can no longer be used for other vehicles. Ford even shows this under their procal only listing (no calibration included) https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-12655-F ***The ProCal 4 tool locks to the VIN of the vehicle***

Both the procal, and the calibration are VIN locked. If this was installed on a vehicle, it’s a complete paper weight to any other vehicle.

Yes, anything built after 12/13/24, it was removed.

Understandable. I’ll post of video of it in the morning for you. My Bronco is currently at work

Up to you, but there’s a lot of things I’d spend $50 on long before a damper for my glove box door lol I’m sure I could post a video of opening my glove box that has a damper if you want to see it though.

Well for the affected models that the recall can currently repair, it appears only to be a software issue. Because it closes the recall for those after it’s been completed

Well that one you posted a picture of isn’t the correct part number. If you just google N2DZ-78044D70-AA you’ll see it for sale in numerous places.

Negative. Not even slightly. This is definitely some type of mechanical failure. We have a bronco in the shop right now that has a similar sound (not anywhere as bad and much more intermittent though) and found a few of the torque converter nuts not tightened. I would agree with @HeliPilot...

Yes. It’s the same bezel the raptors use

Completely different engine than the bronco has. Considering the Bronco doesn't use a timing belt, I'd say it's pretty irrelevant. Even for the oil pump belt issues on the 1.0 ecoboosts, the belt wasn't the cause of the failures, it was a faulty tensioner design. We've seen one bronco oil pump...

https://www.ford.com/product/20212024-bronco-17-x-85-wheel-kit-sinister-bronze-p2941563424 https://www.ford.com/product/20212024-bronco-17-x-85-wheel-kit-matte-black-p2738338379 https://www.ford.com/product/20212024-bronco-17-x-85-wheel-kit-machined-face-p2941553350

It's not available separately from Ford. You would have to buy a whole new sun visor.

Yeah I'm not sure. Honestly after looking at mine, yours looks completely normal. My camera seems to be pointed down a lot more to be honest, but even I can see the bottom of my spare tire and mine has never been touched 🤷‍♂️

Bronco front differentials don’t have a cover. And they already have a drain plug

That may be true. But what I was referring to in comment you quoted was current assembly line production.

You’re just assuming they did absolutely nothing and then claimed it was fixed. Which I doubt is what happened. I don’t think anyone would claim they fixed something after doing nothing, they would simply say they weren’t able to duplicate it. They likely did or found something they thought was...