Yeah, this seems shaky. These engines were designed with auto start/stop in mind.Source?
IF it were an option, rather than forced upon you, would you have ordered it?I've always been uncomfortable with vehicles with Auto Start/Stop. The first time I experienced the "feature" it was somewhat disconcerting having the vehicle stop running at a red light. At first, I fought against it. Although I never fully reprogrammed it out of existence, I'd still generally turn it off each time I'd drive the vehicle. The Bronco version of ASS seems to be a little less aggressive than some of my former vehicles. However, there are still little annoyances such as it turning off the engine as I stop in my driveway, only to immediately turn back on as the transmission is shifted to Park.
But why so much vitriol for a "feature" that is pretty benign. Certain consumers seem to hate this capability. Is it because so many of us from the older generations have been taught that starting/stopping the engine is wasteful or even actually damaging to an engine? Or because we are stubborn and don't like being told what to do by new technology that is often perceived to be imposed on us by the "nanny state"?
Clearly, the new technology and engine tolerances make this capability non-destructive in terms of engine wear and tear. It also, on the whole, leads to some incremental MPG gains.
So why do so many of us still feel angst or discomfort with ASS?
the FORD procal lets you turn on/off ASS and saves that state.If you want to use it - there it is. If you don’t…. Well, you have to hit that stupid button each and every time.
The seatbelt isn't automatic, no one is clicking it in for you. You can choose not to use it and accept the risks that come with it, including the possibility of getting pulled over.The only reason I hate it - you don’t get the choice. I have nothing against it technically one way or the other. If you want to use it - there it is. If you don’t…. Well, you have to hit that stupid button each and every time.
Should be my car my choice. But it isn’t.
(I feel the same way about wearing a seatbelt for what it’s worth)
I mean, taxi (and now uber/lyfts) routinely put 300k on original engines in Escape Hybrids. Prius engines are pretty reliable as well. I haven't come across any actual studies, but my old fleet manager that sold almost exclusively taxis said Yellow cab routinely sent Escapes past the SF Mileage service limit to LA, where there were no mileage restrictions since they were still good.Manufacturers have taken longevity into account using crankshaft position sensors to optimize starting and synthetic oils certainly help. Still the reality is that engine starting is where the greatest amount of wear takes place versus idling or driving.
https://www.bronco6g.com/forum/threads/why-do-we-hate-auto-start-stop-so-much.97405/
Nobody can convince me that an engine that's had 500,000 stop-start cycles will have the same wear on it than one that's only had 50,000 cycles but it's hard to quantify if it's worth overly worrying about especially in an era where people seem to move to new vehicles every 3-5 years.
Personally I disable it on all my vehicles but that's more of a matter that I don't like that there can at times be delays when you need to make a left turn and in heavy traffic sometimes you have to cut it close to make a turn before the light turns red. Also I personally always want my engine on when I'm in traffic because I want 100% control all the time.