That didn’t answer any of my questions lol but that’s okay.Well, at the risk of being accused of having watched to many police procedurals, as several have pointed out in this thread there is a question(s) of what exactly what it is we are looking at, how it got there (and what "there" exactly is). Since it is the rear diff why not just pull the cover and confirm (assuming this has not already been done)? I personally would have minimally ask for that.
As far was work being done that is not necessary, I am sure it happens all the time, usually by mistake or lack of thoroughness of course. Heck, think all the manual transmissions that have been replaced under warranty and in vain because of the 'Getrag Rattle'.
My dayjob is managing a medical practice, and in this domain unnecessary work is done all the time, not least because there are all sorts of dysfunctional $incentives$ in the system to encourage it. Now the human body is not a machine, and for it in most cases it defiantly is not better off than it was before this unnecessary work...but I get this a limited analogy.
In any case, I side with those who, at least given the evidence as presented, do not find this situation quite as black and white.
I'm arguing that since the OP took the time to post his story here and presumably wants to learn something, perhaps he ought to have followed up a bit more closely. However I do admit that it is more likely then not that his Bronco will be as good as it was before so he will just be out his time/hassle, so 'all's well that ends well'![]()
I think the OP is clearly fine with simply having the broken part fixed and getting the Bronco back. So the what, why, when and how doesn’t really matter in the end.
Sponsored