Bronco Raptor vs. Defender Octa vs. Wrangler 392 - Which Is the Top Dog Off-Road SUV? -- TFL review

[FL Trucker]

For those who prefer to read, here's a summary (via AI):

In this TFLoffroad video, the team takes three high-performance V8 off-road SUVs up the challenging Red Cone Trail in Colorado (summiting at 12,800 ft) to determine which vehicle reigns supreme [00:00].

Obstacle-by-Obstacle Breakdown
1. The Gatekeeper [05:20]
Two massive boulders positioned mid-trail test ground clearance and departure angles.

• Defender Octa: Placed in Off-Road 2 height (12.7" clearance) [06:31]. Scraped its skid plates on the first attempt due to line choice, but once re-aligned, it climbed over smoothly [07:01], [08:49].
• Jeep Wrangler 392: Relied on its solid axles and rock rails. It scraped heavily along the underbody/rock sliders but powered through [11:38], [12:00].
• Bronco Raptor: The extra tire height from its 37s helped clear the obstacle, though its ultra-wide track still caught a slight scrape [13:16].

2. The Rock Garden [21:08]
A technical climb over four large successive boulders requiring precision throttle control and traction.

• Defender Octa: The 6D hydraulic suspension provided exceptional low-speed throttle modulation. It effortlessly climbed the aggressive line with center and rear lockers engaged [22:00], [23:55].
• Jeep Wrangler 392: Struggled significantly due to the lack of a front locker on this Willys trim [25:00]. Got high-centered on the rear diff and had to adjust its line multiple times [26:08].
• Bronco Raptor: Engaging both front and rear lockers alongside 13.1" of ground clearance allowed it to walk up the rocks with minimal drama [28:00].

3. The Dino Steps [32:08]
Deep, offset ruts that test cross-articulation and how well the suspension keeps tires on the ground.

• Defender Octa: The hydraulic-air 6D system cross-links dampers to mimic sway bar disconnection [16:17]. It lifted a couple of wheels over 4-foot deep ruts but maintained traction via terrain management [33:40], [34:33].
• Jeep Wrangler 392: Without a sway bar disconnect, the solid axles were forced to lift several wheels high in the air [35:10].
• Bronco Raptor: Pressing the electronic front sway bar disconnect allowed maximum wheel travel, keeping more tires planted than the other two [37:30].

Vehicle Pros & Cons Highlights

• Land Rover Defender Octa
  • Pros: Unmatched air/hydraulic ride comfort off-road [17:00]; highest ground clearance and sophisticated terrain management [06:31].
  • Cons: Extremely expensive ($160k) [04:44]; large 20" wheels limit tire sidewall flexibility [30:15]; exhaust note is overly muted despite the V8 [30:53].
• Jeep Wrangler 392 (Willys)
  • Pros: Loud, visceral V8 exhaust note ("American theater") [18:06]; lowest price of the group ($75k) [02:54].
  • Cons: High weight over the front axle [11:00]; poor fuel economy (<4 MPG off-road) [31:22]; lacks front locker on this specific trim [18:49].
• Ford Bronco Raptor
  • Pros: 37" tires and electronic sway bar disconnect provide best-in-class articulation [00:46], [38:18]; easy-to-use GOAT trail modes [19:35].
  • Cons: Exceptionally wide body makes tight, tree-lined trails stressful [36:43].

Final Verdict [40:15]
The hosts agreed that all three vehicles successfully reached the 12,811 ft summit without mechanical breakdown [42:32]:

• Gatekeeper: Wrangler 392 (for clearing it on smaller 35" tires) [40:15].
• Rock Garden: Defender Octa (for superior clearance and low-speed control) [40:24].
• Dino Steps: Bronco Raptor (for best suspension articulation) [40:28].

Overall: The Defender Octa stole the show with its revolutionary 6D suspension technology and capability, while the Bronco Raptor proved to be the ultimate hardware heavy-hitter, and the Wrangler 392 delivered the best value and raw V8 fun [40:32], [41:35].

Sponsored

 

[userdude]

C'mon, we all know the Braptor struggles in narrow Starbucks drive thrus. The Defender Octa on the other hand has hand warmers that deploy for the handover from the window. Octa in a runaway!!

 

[23OBX2.7]

LOL it's a joke comparison unless $60-80K in upgrades done to the domestics.

 

[Valhalla]

Why was there no Gwagon if you are going to do one like this?

 

[Edumakated]

They should have used a 392 Rubicon / Moab as the Octo and Raptor are top of the line models. The Willy's spec isn't fully loaded and doesn't have front lockers.

 

[userdude]

Why was there no Gwagon if you are going to do one like this?

Didn't Lambo have a $200k 4x4?

 

[stampede1]

They should have used a 392 Rubicon / Moab as the Octo and Raptor are top of the line models. The Willy's spec isn't fully loaded and doesn't have front lockers.

Agreed. However, considering its limitations in that respect, it did very well overall.

 

[Desmolicious]

What is never mentioned is how overpriced the Wrangler 392 is.
A standard Wrangler Willys in the same exact spec minus the 392 motor is $52k. Add the motor and the price is $72K.

A 2026 Dodge Durango SRT 392 w the exact same motor as the Willys 392 is $50K.

Of course the joke is on the original Wrangler 392 buyers who paid over $100k because Jeep said it was a limited edition one and done never to be seen again vehicle….

And that is not even mentioning the fuel starvation issues the Wrangler 392 suffers from - go down a steep incline w the gas tank less than half full, and the pump starts to suck air stalling the vehicle.

 

[Edumakated]

Prices got insane. I pre-ordered a 392XR in fall of '21 and delivered in May 22. It was just $76k out the door. About $8k below MSRP from Granger. I thought that pricing was crazy expensive then and no way I would have dropped $100k for one.

I wanted a Braptor but couldn't get one at the time and they too were asking like $100k when finally released.

 

[Dral97]

Seriously. If they are going to pit those up against a defender, they need to take something like my 392 AEV upfit up there, not a stock 392.

Sponsored