- Joined
- Dec 16, 2023
- Threads
- 47
- Messages
- 736
- Reaction score
- 1,422
- Location
- Washington DC
- Vehicle(s)
- 24 OBX, 20 GLS 450, 14 VW Tiquan
- Your Bronco Model
- Outer Banks
In my opinion, when you willingly buy a vehicle with a removable top, "leaks" are a risk you take. Has been that way since the dawn of automotive time. Ford's lawyers will easily defeat that argument with plenty of other examples from other manufacturers over the past several decades.
But defective materials (hard top cracks), well that might be a different story, and is the one area I could see extended warranties being issues as a result of a class action suit for the tops affected the most, which I believe is the MIC top only. I don't think the painted tops are impacted, or at least not yet? This is my whole point that I mentioned in another thread about just replacing the defective tops as they come in for warranty replacement with a painted top option. Or, at least give the car owner the option to select a painted top with the condition of signing a waiver of liability for the MIC top they had that was clearly defective.
End of the day, I think the arguments will be based upon reasonable assumptions of performance, emphasis on "reasonable". Is it reasonable to assume a removable top could develop leaks? Yes. I think it is reasonable to assume, based upon multiple removals over time with no way of knowing if the process was followed correctly by the owner as intended by the manufacturer.
Is it reasonable to assume the core components of the top should not disintegrate due to common weather elements over a certain amount of time? Yes, absolutely, that is a reasonable assumption to make. The MIC tops should not be cracking or otherwise be defective.
What will Ford do? Well, in my own opinion, like mentioned above, offer the owners a different (more dependable) version of the top (painted). Or replace the defective top with a new MIC if the customer elects to stay with the MIC in general, reset the warranty for the new top to say, 5 years / 60k miles, and call it a day. Or something along those lines.
Leaks? I don't think you've got a dog in that fight, unfortunately. But might motivate Ford to redesign or retrofit some seals.
But defective materials (hard top cracks), well that might be a different story, and is the one area I could see extended warranties being issues as a result of a class action suit for the tops affected the most, which I believe is the MIC top only. I don't think the painted tops are impacted, or at least not yet? This is my whole point that I mentioned in another thread about just replacing the defective tops as they come in for warranty replacement with a painted top option. Or, at least give the car owner the option to select a painted top with the condition of signing a waiver of liability for the MIC top they had that was clearly defective.
End of the day, I think the arguments will be based upon reasonable assumptions of performance, emphasis on "reasonable". Is it reasonable to assume a removable top could develop leaks? Yes. I think it is reasonable to assume, based upon multiple removals over time with no way of knowing if the process was followed correctly by the owner as intended by the manufacturer.
Is it reasonable to assume the core components of the top should not disintegrate due to common weather elements over a certain amount of time? Yes, absolutely, that is a reasonable assumption to make. The MIC tops should not be cracking or otherwise be defective.
What will Ford do? Well, in my own opinion, like mentioned above, offer the owners a different (more dependable) version of the top (painted). Or replace the defective top with a new MIC if the customer elects to stay with the MIC in general, reset the warranty for the new top to say, 5 years / 60k miles, and call it a day. Or something along those lines.
Leaks? I don't think you've got a dog in that fight, unfortunately. But might motivate Ford to redesign or retrofit some seals.
Sponsored
Last edited:
