Exactly what I was thinking. Also has some current gen Honda Pilot lines. The Bronco doesn't look like anything else, which is a big point in its favor.Reminds me a little of the older Dodge Durangos
Sponsored
Exactly what I was thinking. Also has some current gen Honda Pilot lines. The Bronco doesn't look like anything else, which is a big point in its favor.Reminds me a little of the older Dodge Durangos
No.I'll admit I've spent more time thinking about this topic in my head than I care to admit. Been trying to think of how can squeeze this into their lineup because it obviously would take sales away from Explorer (their #1 SUV) and the Bronco (something we all care about here).
SO... general questions for the crowd:
- Would you trade in your Bronco for an Everest if it were to come stateside??
- Would you buy an Everest if it was only available in a hybrid powertrain? Would it replace your Bronco??
- Would you rather see the Bronco get a hybrid powertrain??
- Would you buy an Everest if it was a slightly more luxury-oriented SUV but not quite all of the off-road capabilities of the Bronco??
Actually, what if they added it to the Lincoln brand?I'll admit I've spent more time thinking about this topic in my head than I care to admit. Been trying to think of how can squeeze this into their lineup because it obviously would take sales away from Explorer (their #1 SUV) and the Bronco (something we all care about here).
SO... general questions for the crowd:
- Would you trade in your Bronco for an Everest if it were to come stateside??
- Would you buy an Everest if it was only available in a hybrid powertrain? Would it replace your Bronco??
- Would you rather see the Bronco get a hybrid powertrain??
- Would you buy an Everest if it was a slightly more luxury-oriented SUV but not quite all of the off-road capabilities of the Bronco??
The Explorer is what your wife drives. The Everest is a true off-road body-on-frame vehicle alike Bronco. However, while they're both built on the Ford Australia-designed T6 Ranger platform, Everest and Bronco are different in every way.I'll admit I've spent more time thinking about this topic in my head than I care to admit. Been trying to think of how can squeeze this into their lineup because it obviously would take sales away from Explorer (their #1 SUV) and the Bronco (something we all care about here).
SO... general questions for the crowd:
---
- Would you trade in your Bronco for an Everest if it were to come stateside??
- Would you buy an Everest if it was only available in a hybrid powertrain? Would it replace your Bronco??
- Would you rather see the Bronco get a hybrid powertrain??
- Would you buy an Everest if it was a slightly more luxury-oriented SUV but not quite all of the off-road capabilities of the Bronco??
EDIT-- In case it wasn't obvious, I think it could fit into the Ford lineup here in North America if it came in as a slightly more upscale SUV with the hybrid powertrain. But the question is if people would still want it.
Oh I agree the vehicles are very different, but the overall customer base has a lot of overlap between Bronco and Everest, which is the problem.The Explorer is what your wife drives. The Everest is a true off-road body-on-frame vehicle alike Bronco. However, while they're both built on the Ford Australia-designed T6 Ranger platform, Everest and Bronco are different in every way.
I own two Broncos, and would leap at the chance to finally get an Everest here.Oh I agree the vehicles are very different, but the overall customer base has a lot of overlap between Bronco and Everest, which is the problem.
Of course, the more hard-core off-roaders would stick with the Bronco. No question about that.
But my hunch is there are a ton of "weekend adventurers" (for lack of a better term) who need more of a family vehicle during the week, but still something that can be used off-road and some light towing on the weekend. Today they would likely be willing to buy a Bronco. But if the Everest was available, they probably would buy that over the Bronco.
So the question is if the more enthusiast off-road market is large enough to support and make Bronco a financially viable product on it's own. Personally, I don't think it is, and I'm guessing the folks at Ford also believe the same thing since there is very little market overlap between the Bronco and the Everest.
If it came in a stick shift and if the B-pillar didn't stab me in the shoulder, maybe.SO... general questions for the crowd:
- Would you trade in your Bronco for an Everest if it were to come stateside??
- Would you buy an Everest if it was only available in a hybrid powertrain? Would it replace your Bronco??
- Would you rather see the Bronco get a hybrid powertrain??
- Would you buy an Everest if it was a slightly more luxury-oriented SUV but not quite all of the off-road capabilities of the Bronco??
You'll just have to learn how to say "G'day Mate" correctly after you moveThis will be my next truck.
.
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a61947917/ford-everest-tremor-suv-revealed/
Ford needs to think like Proctor and Gamble: the more shelf space (or dealer floor space) you occupy, the more likely the customer is going out the door with one of your products. Sixteen detergents, seven marketed in the US, and how many sub-varieties of Tide are there, anyway?I would take sales from Explorer, but the Sport would get hit the worst, that's why we'll never see it.
I wouldn't be surprised if they do put a Lincoln marque on it. The Bronco pickup is in the works, they say. Can you imagine a Lincoln "Bronco" pickup? They'll sure stare when I back my cigarette boat down the boat launch at the yacht club!Bronco has too much luxury in it as it is. Maybe they should sell it as a Lincoln.