- Thread starter
- #46
So funny how this post triggered so many people - Even when they look at photos of your example, and other (SEMA!!!) examples - some people still cant believe it... amazingNope, the #1 reason it's there is for REAR passenger safety. Common sense. Secondarily, it does add to the stiffness of the body, not the Frame, as the roll bar is NOT directly attached to the frame.
I no longer have rear passengers!!!
By this logic "every single pickup ever made should have a roll bar in the back or the frame will buckle".... pure hogwash. And the fact that the two-door Bronco has almost half the bending leverage compared to a 6 or 8 ft pickup bed frame. Plus I don't have any reason to be hauling a 1500 lb payload in the back of my 4 ft bed pickup.
Lastly, the way the rear suspension supports the load on the rear coilovers, that are canted at an angle forward, is a design that completely eliminates the force on the rear of the frame behind the rear axle.
Nearly 100% of the weight on the rear axle is attached to the frame 6 to 8 inches ahead of the rear axle.
This fact alone eliminates any of the frame twisting or body movement that you were describing of or have wishful thinking for. Anything behind the rear frame coil spring mounts are just hanging in the wind, and NOT very intragal to the structure of the rest of the truck.
Sponsored