well, for the longest time, the narrative has been "Look over there! it's webasto screwing everything up!" and now they've finally admitted "Ooooooooook, I guess that was a bad design that we told them to build...."not to be picky....but have they?
My impression is MIC 2.0 is intended to remedy the flat panel cuts which leave untreated surface...and also to finish with a heavier final coat to remedy the snakeskin.
I'd really like to be proven wrong....anyone else have additional info??
Sponsored