Sponsored

Octane and Power

nwardoh

Outer Banks
Active Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2023
Threads
8
Messages
27
Reaction score
48
Location
Richland Center, WI
Vehicle(s)
2023 Bronco
Your Bronco Model
Outer Banks
So my '23 f150 with the 3.5 makes a lot more power running 93 and respectable gains on 91 e0. Will the 2.7 be the same way? Picking up my wife's new whip tomorrow.
Sponsored

 

OBXBRONCO

Wildtrak
Well-Known Member
First Name
mike
Joined
Jan 27, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
139
Reaction score
285
Location
Bath NC
Vehicle(s)
2023 Bronco Wildtrak
Your Bronco Model
Wildtrak
Clubs
 
I feel like 93 makes a difference though I've only ran one tank of 87 when i first got it. Ran 93 ever since. 7500 miles so far. Trip 1 average has been 19.6 mpg since new. Check every tank and they're ranging from 20 to 22+. All types of driving but mostly highway commutes with occasional dirt road riding and several beach trips. 22.3 so far on this last tank. Calculator checked several times. always within a couple of tenths. 2023 wildtrak so of course 2.7 auto and 35s.
 

Aonarch

Outer Banks
Well-Known Member
First Name
Jack Hoff
Joined
Aug 4, 2021
Threads
17
Messages
1,617
Reaction score
3,080
Location
MT
Vehicle(s)
‘23 Bronco OBX 2DR Lux 2.7, ‘24 V60 Polestar
Your Bronco Model
Outer Banks
Clubs
 
Ford lists this everywhere...

Yes, both the 2.3 and 2.7 have moderate power increases with 93.

A very small amount of vehicles actually have the hardware (Octane sensors) and/or software (Fuel maps, ignition timing, etc) to do this.
 

Ninjak

Raptor
Well-Known Member
First Name
David
Joined
Feb 19, 2022
Threads
27
Messages
2,743
Reaction score
4,711
Location
Miami
Vehicle(s)
2024 Bronco Raptor 68 Mustang GTA 2024 Mustang Dark Horse
Your Bronco Model
Raptor
I run 93. I also have a tune and mods. yes, I make more power. And it's fun.
 

Sponsored

cbrenthus

Badlands
Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2021
Threads
38
Messages
1,551
Reaction score
3,495
Location
Western PA
Vehicle(s)
'22 BadSquatch, '02 T/A
Your Bronco Model
Badlands
Ford lists this everywhere...

Yes, both the 2.3 and 2.7 have moderate power increases with 93.

A very small amount of vehicles actually have the hardware (Octane sensors) and/or software (Fuel maps, ignition timing, etc) to do this.
Actually, most, if not all, vehicles for the last few decades have knock sensors and retard the timing if preignition is sensed. On my '03 Sentra Spec-V it was a big deal because the knock sensor was overly sensitive and would rob the engine of power even with 93 octane. When I had an '11 Camaro SS, a common issue on the forums was from dealers that put in regular fuel before delivery, causing knock and retarded timing, and the computer wouldn't switch back until you removed a couple fuses overnight.

The other important thing to note is that if you run 87, the engine will sense the knock and retard the timing so it goes away, however, preignition has already occurred which is not good for engines.

My simple answer is that I always run what the manual says to run. Most vehicles I've had did not call for premium, so I ran regular. But if it says premium, or premium is best for performance, then I run premium. ;)
 

Aonarch

Outer Banks
Well-Known Member
First Name
Jack Hoff
Joined
Aug 4, 2021
Threads
17
Messages
1,617
Reaction score
3,080
Location
MT
Vehicle(s)
‘23 Bronco OBX 2DR Lux 2.7, ‘24 V60 Polestar
Your Bronco Model
Outer Banks
Clubs
 
Actually, most, if not all, vehicles for the last few decades have knock sensors and retard the timing if preignition is sensed. On my '03 Sentra Spec-V it was a big deal because the knock sensor was overly sensitive and would rob the engine of power even with 93 octane. When I had an '11 Camaro SS, a common issue on the forums was from dealers that put in regular fuel before delivery, causing knock and retarded timing, and the computer wouldn't switch back until you removed a couple fuses overnight.

The other important thing to note is that if you run 87, the engine will sense the knock and retard the timing so it goes away, however, preignition has already occurred which is not good for engines.

My simple answer is that I always run what the manual says to run. Most vehicles I've had did not call for premium, so I ran regular. But if it says premium, or premium is best for performance, then I run premium. ;)
Yup!

I am running 93 during the summer to help prevent preignition, and will switch to 87 in the winter.
 

Gtrekker

Wildtrak
Well-Known Member
First Name
Gary
Joined
Dec 22, 2020
Threads
58
Messages
1,508
Reaction score
1,999
Location
NJ
Vehicle(s)
Braptor, Audi, M1102 Overland Trailer 2-B
Your Bronco Model
Wildtrak
Clubs
 
So my '23 f150 with the 3.5 makes a lot more power running 93 and respectable gains on 91 e0. Will the 2.7 be the same way? Picking up my wife's new whip tomorrow.
Not sure you can quantify the difference with the seat of your pants n pedal on a stock setup.

Once you do some upgrades and mapping that requires the higher grade is when you will enjoy it more.

Till then... the engine will run cleaner which is a good thing to.
 

Tacanta14

Black Diamond
Well-Known Member
First Name
Wasichu
Joined
Feb 2, 2022
Threads
8
Messages
238
Reaction score
339
Location
Pie Town, NM
Vehicle(s)
2022 Black Diamond 4 Door 2.3 MT
Your Bronco Model
Black Diamond
I'm at 7800', and rarely drive below 4500', so I use 87 all the time. Averaging about 21.5 mpg overall, but usually 24.5 when I'm not towing my 2000 lb teardrop.
 

1st 75th ranger

Black Diamond
Well-Known Member
First Name
jeffrey
Joined
Sep 20, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
788
Reaction score
387
Location
nj
Vehicle(s)
2021 ford bronco bd 4 dr sasquatch
Your Bronco Model
Black Diamond
So my '23 f150 with the 3.5 makes a lot more power running 93 and respectable gains on 91 e0. Will the 2.7 be the same way? Picking up my wife's new whip tomorrow.
i run e85 instead seems to run better then 104 octane i was running
Sponsored

 
 





Top