- Banned
- #31
i meant to show a reaction, I could do that here as well
Sponsored
i meant to show a reaction, I could do that here as well
We had one til feelings got hurt. It was glorious.
I don't want a truck version but that looks wicked.
I was gonna say that but I was afraid I might hurt somebody's feelings!We had one til feelings got hurt. It was glorious.
Yep getting use to a vehicle is part of it. My old lifted CJ-5 was essentially undrivable by anyone but me (partly due to the crummy pre-saginaw worn Ross roller/cam steering box). That rig was like steering a boat, lol.I agree! I've had a Gladiator and am on my 7th Wrangler! I have no issues with the drive in either the Gladiator or the Wranglers....guess I am used to it.
Haha, she’s 57.
She has done all the typical Wrangler appearance mods, against my judgement.![]()
Does the above still hold true?the [Bronco] doesn't look good until you accessorize it a bit. the lower end/base models are ugly AF. get one that has a mild lift and nice wheels/35-37's and a couple exterior accessories and it looks pretty bad ass actually.
Isn't that called a Ranger?I know I am not the only one(even if its a small group) that would love to see a bronco with a bed seeing how many gladiators I see out. I am still hoping for bronco with a bed one day
no no i want my bronco with every thing the way it is but with a bedIsn't that called a Ranger?
I dont think so. the bronco looks a ton better right outta the box. can you tell me a base/squatch doesn't look good with no aftermarket help?? I sure can't say that. sure the base model glads dont have the option for a sasquatch style package, still....Does the above still hold true?
We had one til feelings got hurt. It was glorious.
Never understand how the minority wins over the majority.
I don't want a truck version but that looks wicked.