When I say I think they are artificially low I’m trying to say that maybe if it was tested to the max maybe it would be 6.8k or something not like 8.5k. I think ford is keeping it at 6k and below for class, tax, DOT, and CAFE reasons among a bunch more that I don’t even know about. Like in a F150, 250, 350 etc. can’t go over a certain weight. Not because it can’t necessarily handle it. Hell I towed a 12k tractor with a F150 but it was short and sweet and not on a freeway. Liability also comes in to play if ford says that the payload is 1500lbs or it can tow 7500lbs and a bunch flip there is no avoiding a class action. The other part comes in from a warranty aspect but that’s a whole different can of worms. I think it all revolves around a Jeep Wrangler, Ford is trying to compete/beat them but if all Jeep has to say is yeah but you’re in a different class or small vs large SUV it’s kind of a wash. Just my takeSo how would a 4 door have more payload with the same suspension and as a heavier vehicle and still stay under 6,000 pounds GVWR? I assume it would have to have a higher GVWR.
I also am not buying that the payload is artificially low. Your payload is what the vehicle says. Every vehicle can probably exceed payload by a bit, but it's the potential issues that can occur when you do. That may be insurance, warranty, liability, parts breaking etc. It's simply not a good idea to run a vehicle above listed payload and towing specs.
Also, it sounds like a roof top tent/roof rack is going to cause some major stability issues if the suspension is already so soft that its payload is under 1000 pounds. Probably another reason the rack is not offered on sasquatch and has such a low weight rating.
This is frustrating, as I do a lot of backcountry camping with quite a bit of gear/weight. Payload and towing are my two biggest concerns on this thing. Sucks, because it has so much potential. Ford, just build a full size bronco already!
Sponsored
Last edited: