- First Name
- Dave
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2020
- Threads
- 42
- Messages
- 4,078
- Reaction score
- 16,559
- Location
- Hanging Rock, North Carolina
- Vehicle(s)
- 19 Z71, 06 VTX1300, 94 Cobra, 21 BL Bronco 4dr.
- Your Bronco Model
- Badlands
It was used as an example (a well overused one I agree) of the mentality of the general public, not as a factual or direct comparison.Not to get into it, but you REALLY need to read up on this case. It's been used as a false narrative for decades now and it's ridiculously incorrect.
The lady sued them because:
The coffee was a LOT hotter than it was supposed to be.
The lid wasn't fastened correctly.
When she asked McDonalds to pay her medical bills (3rd degree burns on her thighs requiring skin grafts) they said no.
Further, McDonalds admitted they were serving coffee that was well beyond safe temps and there were several other cases where this happened that they also ignored after investigations.
The lady asked for her medical bills to be paid in the lawsuit and a jury awarded her millions. The judge then reduced that AND put 40% of the blame on her as well.
Facts matter.
Went back and edited it to be a totally outlandish claim.
Apparently some took it to mean I either:
A) thought the injuries were not too bad
B) Sided with Mc'd on it
C) thought it was a concocted suit
D)am actually the Hamburgler and trying to protect the brand.
FWIW I agree any coffee so hot it requires grafts is just poor care on the restaurant's end and her asking for medical bills to be covered was justifiable and humble on her part, so not a great example from the get-go for me to use.
Sponsored
Last edited: