Search results

YES!!!!!! FoMoCo please do this with a 2.7L and MT.....PLEASE!!!!!!!!!

I didn't want to bias the comments, as if you've seen my other post in regards to the 2.3L vs. 2.7L or the ones where there are debates over the MT not being offered with the 2.7L, you'd already know that I'm in the Direct & Port Injection camp. @mneblett (who I'd say is way more knowledgeable...

Time will tell, but most likely (like it has already been mentioned) a few color changes (exterior & interior).

Test are setup with PARAMETERS that everyday MT drivers might tend not to do. I tend to "coast" way more than those test (among other things). I constantly will try to get more MPG. It like when you plugin a destination into your GPS and it states that it will take you X amount of time to get...

Very good questions. I have my opinion, but I'll wait for others to chime in before I do, as I'm pretty set in which fuel injection setup I want.

Yes, the weight of the tow vehicle is important and is a factor during winds and with heavy trailers that don't have trailer brakes. As to the Bronco's weight, it has been estimated elsewhere on this form, but it hasn't been brought up much within all of the different Tow Threads as the common...

With the 2.7L being the ONLY Direct & Port Injection Engine Offered and the Fact that I Will Not Buy a Direct Injection Only Engine, I'm currently a Non-Buyer. Yes, I'd love to see FoMoCo mate a MT to the 2.7L, but if they'd add the Port Injection to the 2.3L, that would work for me...

The 2.7L w/MT (my only issue is that the engine Must Have Direct & Port Fuel Injection). I'm currently a Non-Buyer, but if FoMoCo can either Update the 2.3L to Direct & Port Fuel Injection or mate a MT to the 2.7L , it would turn me into a Buyer.

@rapidredbronco2021 I understand why FoMoCo did it as well, but I have an issue with the 2.3L being Direct Injection Only and I'm not going to buy an AT. So, I'm out until they redesign the 2.3L or they mate the MT to the 2.7L. Hopefully 2022 an exceptionable choice will be available.....

But not the Larger Engine, which IMHO is also what most (well those that I know) enthusiast want. It "appears" that FoMoCo talked to 90% Jeep Owners (who never owned an EB) and 10% EB Owners (that would never bought a Jeep). With the 2.3L being a better engine than an of the Jeeps current...

I want a MT, but I will not buy any engine that it Direct Injected Only. But it's the Enthusiasts that Make The Image that the Non-Enthusiasts want to Emulate.... smh...

The 2.3L "would have been" perfectly fine for me IF it had the Direct AND Port Fuel Injection, but it currently doesn't. Yes it will have enough power to handle the 35's (and most likely larger), but I can't get past the Direct Injection Only. So it's not an option "for me". I also want a MT...

I've said it before and I'll say it again....... When the MT was originally designed, it Should Have Been Designed With A Bolt On Bell-housing. PERIOD! I'm going to be one of the buyers who will have to wait to see what FoMoCo offers for 2022, as I will not buy a Direct Injection Only Engine...

well........ it is "bolted on"..... so...... if someone wants to remove it, it can be removed, but it will require tools.

Without the Removable Side Windows for the 2D, it a DEFINITE NO Ghost Rider!

Sadly, but most likely true and this is another reason why I hope that FoMoCo will offer the 2.7L w/MT for 2022. (Please... don't burst my bubble! Let me dream for a little while longer, as I'm full aware that it's a Very Slim Chance of happening....)

Also with the can higher, any oil residue in the line going to the can, can theoretically drain back to the engine. There are even Catch Cans which have a hose off of the bottom that lead back to the Oil Pan. So you never have to drain the can, as it's constantly returning the oil to the oil pan.

After thinking about the application of the brakes to the inner rear wheel (Front Dig), it wouldn't be an issue with a MT if the rear axle wasn't locked. If the rear axle had an Electric Locker, then the computer could unlock it, making it an Standard Open Axle, apply braking to the inner...

Remote Start with a MT would only need a way to know that the transmission is in neutral, park brake is engaged and will possibly need to be able to bypass the clutch safely switch. All of this is relatively easy for FoMoCo to do. All of those signs are already being captured by the vehicle's...

Yes (basically), an aftermarket load distributing hitch will most likely adversely affect the departure angle. Now with that said, an aftermarket rear bumper with the Class III Receiver incorporated within it would most likely not cause any departure angle issue.