I think I found it. (Molex page actually have an interactive model of it, so you can spin it around to check indexing groove location, etc)
https://www.molex.com/molex/products/part-detail/crimp_housings/0310671041
there are a number of variants. The one we need is polarization B. The xmas...
yah, that price seems outrageous. Unfortunately, I wasn't able to find any other seller with that plug/pigtail. I do have to admit that I'm not a pro at this, someone with more experience may have a better idea on where to look.
I did send an email to that seller, to see how many comes for that...
They look like this pair. Checking to see if there is a retail pack available.
https://connectorexperts.com/i-31644481-ce3351m.html?ref=category:1261629
https://connectorexperts.com/i-31645098-ce3351f.html?ref=category:1261629
That is perfect, thank you!! That also confirms that the commonly found "Ford Speaker Harness 1998-UP" does not work on the Bronco. I'll do some research and see if I can find something that looks to work. Will report back. Thank you!
Peter
@BroncoTPA can you please take some pictures of the stock 4" speaker connectors for us (both front and back speakers if they look different)? The kick panel 6.5 we already have pictures and link of a working harness, so that one we can skip.
Also, can you look on the stock speaker to see if...
they did pop-in on the soft-top rubbing thread and asked the OP to send them some info through PM. It does seem like they are trying to do something about some of these issues.
Peter
Yah, tent being 140 lbs, plus mounting hardware, you are looking at 30% over the dynamic weight limit. Even though 30lbs doesn't sound like a lot, 30% is...
And IMO, the bigger issue may be hardtop structure integrity. Heck, the MIC hardtop is already delaminating and have poor fit and finish...
even if not higher towing capacity, having increased tongue capacity (while staying with the factory GVWR) would mean now the RP-189 with 354 lb tongue weight is within limits?
Or is there another factor that would prevent this?
Peter
Ah, forgot about that. That's pretty crazy (in a bad way). I actually never thought about that... Total trailer weight limit is 3500, and tongue weight limit of 350. Assuming 12.5%(split 10-15%) of the trailer weight being the tongue weight, that's a realistic trailer weight of 2800lb.....
Peter
How so? loaded trailer being 3800lb would mean tongue weight is 400-450lb range. How would that immediately push it over the payload on the bronco?
Genuinely confused about this.
Peter
https://www.fordedgeforum.com/topic/29113-new-motorcraft-oil-filter-fl-2062-a-vs-the-fl-2062/
https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/motorcraft-fl2062-vs-fl2062a.333396/
found these. It looks like the older FL-2062 had the plastic cap, and the newer FL-2062-A is all paper with glue...
Disclaimer: I'm far from an expert on this
This is one of the questions I had early on. After some research (which consists mainly of watching YouTube videos),my summary is that a traction control system brakes spinning tires when spinning is detected, therefore sending power to the opposite...
https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/rigid-images/dev/Original/10001/11-13521-A-360%20Series.pdf
according to the rigid documentation, it comes with bare wire leads. So yes, you will need more wiring. If you have the aux switch option on the Bronco, then it's minimal. However, if you are not...
I don't think there is a very clear cut answer on this. So many different variables affect this, such as the weight you're carrying in the hatch, the tongue weight of your trailer, the combined weight of your driver and front row passenger, etc etc.
Here's my take, the Bronco's suspension is on...
Yes, many vehicles from the factory have different height front and back. You will hear the term "rake" or "reverse rake", describing this state.
Rake is almost necessary on trucks, because of the designed carrying capacity of the truck bed. If the vehicle is "level" when unloaded, the...