Search results

Nobody is buying it for fuel economy. That doesn’t mean it wouldn’t be nice to have it get better fuel economy. Word is that hybrid 2.3T power train will get around 340hp/500 LB-ft AND get good fuel economy. I mean… doesn’t that sound tempting, or are we all sticking with the “I didn’t buy it...

Gee people. There is a global supply chain crisis going on right now. You want answers they can’t give you because they don’t know when all the parts will be there. Their suppliers don’t know when they can ship all the parts because their raw materials don’t show up to them when they’re supposed...

Just give us the 3.0 EcoBoost as an option on regular Broncos.

This is the dumbest shit I have read all week. 🤦‍♂️ - they buy and review so many cars, I don’t think they need to save face. You’re just trying so hard to find something that isn’t there. Besides, they also own a Defender and a Bronco! They have a lot more credibility than anyone on a forum...

Probably not good for suppliers, might raise the COGS, and therefore the selling price.

You don’t have to use Park, Neutral is only one click away. Anyway, I think people know from their own experiences the pros and cons of each.

Damn that was good! I keep reading people not wanting to compromise by changing their order because they want it the way they want it. It’s amazing Ford even offers it the way they want it, because I want mine with a 3.0 or 3.5 V6. Right now, just give me some kind of Badlands….2.3, 2.7… just...

Logan area here (formerly Heber City which was even closer and I know all the trails around there), I plan on doing the Moab trip too! I’m tempted to take a drive out to GJ to check these beasts out. Also our Broncos look to be identical except mine is in Area 51. No build date for me yet...

No you won’t need a rear locker. Having 4 Auto would be nice. I would still get the rear locker for drifting and donuts in the snow though :)

Can’t people just take their vehicles wherever the hell they want? Not everyone has something to prove. I doubt my first drive will be on hardcore trails.

haha nice 😂

Where was group 3 when the 0-60 video was uploaded? 😂

Stop kidding yourself. We all hoped, dreamed, and expected it to be pretty quick with a twin turbo V6. I still think it is relatively quick. But there are two types of people: 1. Those who simply accept the reality for what it is, but don’t lower their hopes and expectations just because the...

Exactly, they went quiet after promising it’s all fake - or the guy didn’t know how to mash an accelerator pedal on an automatic. It’s not going to make me cancel my order, but I would like a real world consistent low 6 second run, with enough torque to chirp the tires (even with the 35s).

Did you add on the extra parasitic loss with higher unsprung weight from the Sasquatch package with your scientific link?

The justifications are awesome! “I’m not buying it for fuel economy” “ I’m not buying it for performance.” “I’m not buying it for towing.” what next if other areas are also a let down? “I didn’t buy it for comfort” I didn’t buy it to tackle the toughest trails?” At some point, it’s better to...

if it’s really a 2.3, it’s excusable. But if that’s the twin turbo V6 like it says, it’s pathetic. Even a diesel Rubicon is quicker. I get frustrated with Ford because everything always sounds too good to be true when they announce something. Then they bring it out and it’s not as amazing as...

If Ford had speced the Wildtrak with IRS, Fox suspension, and Torsen differentials, it could have been a true desert runner. It just doesn’t have any tangible benefit over the Badlands for doing what it says it was designed to do. I would get the Badlands 2.7 with Sasquatch, you don’t have to...

Doesn't surprise me that there's little noticeable difference between the two engines. When I worked at a Ford dealership, I was excited about the Edge Sport, and I was disappointed when I drove it, thinking it wasn't that much quicker than the 2.0T. So the gap between the 2.3 and 2.7 has to...

Monroney is just a nickname for it. Named after He's just being a moroney! Both terms are correct, Monroney was the name of the Senator who it was named after.