Search results

Man, I’m glad I don’t have his job. I don’t want the entire Internet holding me personally accountable for the entire company.

Lol I see your point. I guess my thinking was more traditional / old school maybe - 747 “queen of the skies.” - Titanic was a “she.” Would have been funny if they named it “Bill.” 😂

“him?” Planes, boats, cars… always referred to them with female pronouns.

Correct. Without trail control activated, there is no automatic throttle intervention when the wheels are spinning in low range (traction control is automatically disengaged as Goatman stated). But with the Trail Control activated, the brakes apply to the spinning wheels to shift torque to the...

Yeah I know what it is, and I used too. I rode with the instructor, and he pointed out how the traction control is a little more aggressive when using trail control. He was right, the diff locks weren’t needed as much when the Trail Control was active. It would spin for a little bit, then the...

Although the challenge is fun, spinning the tires unnecessarily up the trails ruins it for everyone else who goes up after.

But the traction control does help in low range when using the ‘trail control’ or whatever it’s called, and it does make a difference.

7.3 with 7MT hybrid Nicer interior options with sway bar disconnect available on higher trim models. Include the tan leather concept cup holders and air vents. one touch sky roof like the Jeep solid roof option

Pretty sure I saw you driving around yesterday turning on to Blue Lakes! Nice rig. I live in Logan. Still waiting for mine.

The advantage of the 2.7 isn’t speed, it’s torque. Almost an extra 100 LB-ft. Better for holding higher gears / lower rpm and less turbo lag. Effortless turning of the wheels at higher speeds. The 0-60 times on both engines are pretty close.

Yep, how dare anyone provide any real world negative opinions.

2.3 won’t make it up Parley’s? What the?? Dude, I would drive my old windows 1996 Bounder with a 240hp 460 up Parley’s. Pretty sure a 300hp Bronco will make it up there with no problem at all.

It’s normal, quit worrying

I would take a ‘22 Badlands. But you might be happier waiting for the Raptor.

I bet it will too. But not because the 3.5 is too heavy, but because the 2.7 and 3.0 have the same block dimensions AND the torque limitations on the axles.

It sounds like a bunch of people here just got off a plane. Engines have shut down, but the whining doesn’t stop.

I understood your point just fine. Then I made my points, which you obviously missed. 1. Just because it was designed for something in mind, doesn’t mean it will achieve 100% reliability in that purpose. 2. Just because it MIGHT do well in one area (traffic jams), doesn’t mean it will excel in...

Presumably it was also built to have an aesthetically pleasing roof that didn’t have any issues. Anyway, crawling up Hell’s Revenge in the Summer is a little more challenging for an engine than a traffic jam on the 405, which a Corolla can handle. If you can’t see that then it’s obvious you have...

Congrats! But the comment I left on that video still applies. Your baby will grow up and become a parent before Ford delivers your Bronco, no need to worry about the child seat! :)

The turbo RZRs often get too hot at Moab. I had concerns about the Bronco’s temps on technical trails. Ford might be better off at least offering a naturally aspirated version. 6.8???