Spare Tire Cover Contradiction?

[Last Ride Bronco]

In the Bronco accessories catalog on the Ford website, it shows a 32 inch tire cover on a squatched Bronco. Either it’s a contradiction, or it’s implying that you can carry a 32 inch for a spare on a squatched Bronco (which would require a different rim I think). One possibility is that the pictured Bronco is a BL with 33’s, although it looks like a plastic rear bumper, if so, that wouldn’t be a BL.

Sponsored

 

[ZackDanger]

It wouldn’t necessarily require a different rim… you could absolutely carry whatever size wheel on the back you wanted.

Many Jeep owners will upgrade just 4 tires and/or wheels, and then run their original 5th with a cover as a non-matching spare (to save money)…

But I think whomever mocked up that image just grabbed a cool looking Bronco (squatch) without realizing it wouldn’t fit on the rear tire that would have been included with the squatch package.

(those are the 315 width 35” tires on account of the wider fender flares… not to mention the silver trim rings on the Sas wheels)

 

[dgorsett]

Absolutely correct. What we forget as obsessed 6g members is that no one else would notice this nor care. Good catch.

 

[SnowBronco]

I believe the catalog said they were available for 33's as well.

EDIT... Oh that some bullshit lol. The 33" was only for dealer stock with the dealer name... The others available with much better designs were only 32"....

Sponsored