Has weaker torque at every RPM, too, so the Coyote isn't really anyone's ideal truck engine. The appeal is strictly aural, I imagine.
Sponsored
Last edited:
Sponsored
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2020
- Threads
- 3
- Messages
- 1,120
- Reaction score
- 1,748
- Location
- North Carolina
- Vehicle(s)
- H2 Hummer, Holden Commodore
- Your Bronco Model
- Base
But that’s not what you were originally referring to. Based on your previous post I thought you would be excited to be able to carry an extra cooler of beer with the increased payload from the lighter V8.
FWIW I would pay more for a weaker V8 that didn’t leave me stuck with a turbo failure about 1,000 miles from home - again. Though if given the option I would go for the 7.3L
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2020
- Threads
- 3
- Messages
- 1,120
- Reaction score
- 1,748
- Location
- North Carolina
- Vehicle(s)
- H2 Hummer, Holden Commodore
- Your Bronco Model
- Base
It’s really the perfect engine. Also a nice FU to Jeeps 6.4L Wrangler.
I wonder if the bronco is the most expensive non hybridized 4 banger out there?
Sponsored
It's all about emissions and fuel mileage estimates overall for tge brand. If you want more power.....5Star tune has tuned a 2.7 in a f150 to 600hp
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2020
- Threads
- 3
- Messages
- 1,120
- Reaction score
- 1,748
- Location
- North Carolina
- Vehicle(s)
- H2 Hummer, Holden Commodore
- Your Bronco Model
- Base
How long before those tunes cause the EPA to start fining people $10k per instance?
Another LS performance parts designer released a letter yesterday they were ending a sizeable amount of production due to the EPA coming down on them.
Particularly with turbo engines Increasing engine timing, raising cylinder temperatures - you start creating more NOX emissions, not the fake bologna CO2 emissions.
Another LS performance parts designer released a letter yesterday they were ending a sizeable amount of production due to the EPA coming down on them.
Particularly with turbo engines Increasing engine timing, raising cylinder temperatures - you start creating more NOX emissions, not the fake bologna CO2 emissions.
I'm not racing mine in any off-road events. So my dog has been put away. Ford has to comply with EPA regulations. We'll see how long the Rubicon 392 will last.
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2020
- Threads
- 3
- Messages
- 1,120
- Reaction score
- 1,748
- Location
- North Carolina
- Vehicle(s)
- H2 Hummer, Holden Commodore
- Your Bronco Model
- Base
The 392 just got promised to another new upcoming vehicle in the minivan-tastic Grand Wagoneer. So I imagine it’s safe for at least another 6-7 years.
Therefore, the Rubicon’s 392 will likely last as long as Wranglers generational life.
Sponsored
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2020
- Threads
- 3
- Messages
- 1,120
- Reaction score
- 1,748
- Location
- North Carolina
- Vehicle(s)
- H2 Hummer, Holden Commodore
- Your Bronco Model
- Base
Also you are incorrect, Ford does not have to comply with these particular EPA regulations. They are free to slap the 6.8L into everything they produce and charge customers a couple hundred dollars extra to satisfy the bureaucrats with their pay offs as FCA does.
- Banned
- #72
Can the tranny handle it? Probably not stock
- Banned
- #73
Depends if you live in a state that tests or not?
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2020
- Threads
- 3
- Messages
- 1,120
- Reaction score
- 1,748
- Location
- North Carolina
- Vehicle(s)
- H2 Hummer, Holden Commodore
- Your Bronco Model
- Base
They definitely don’t test on older than 2000 in my county. And for that matter I don’t think they actually check tailpipe emissions in anything. Probably just checking the computer for codes.
- Banned
- #75
My state they don’t check emissions at all. In fact I know a few places for $10 you get a sticker and can pass inspection on a totaled car. Ymmv
Sponsored
Similar threads
