Search results

Hell if I know.

Uhhh ... pretty much every automatic transmission these days has a "manumatic" mode. Not to mention you can just modulate the throttle to force or deny shifting. See these little plus and minus buttons? They do stuff. Including allowing you to manumatically shift. Hell, my 21 year old...

Real time readout is pretty meaningless if you're trying to determine long term rates. My car will tell me anything between 0.1 and 260 MPG at any given moment ... but over the course of a tank it's nowhere near either of those.

All things a skilled driver could do by touch. I stand by what I said.

Do you think driving it on the road is safe? Hell, you can get all kinds of dings and scratches at the mall. Might as well actually go off road and have a good excuse.

It's not a "roll cage" that's why an actual roll cage was installed. Pretty standard for race requirements.

Heated/cooled garage. -40 in the winter, 110 in the summer ... ain't nobody got time fo that.

Yes. The goat modes are primarily a way of pushing one button instead of multiple. A skilled driver should be able to duplicate all of its effects.

If they could fit adequate brakes etc inside a 12" that's what would be optimal. More better.

No. Next.

Of course not, only one person has been able to buy one so far ...

. . .

A more flexible tire will have greater surface area available for contact with the ground. Taller sidewalls coupled with low pressure make that possible. Small wheels with a large diameter tire are strongly favored in many off road situations, unlike pavement driving.

I appreciate your inclusion of a debadge option.

It's no news to me that most people are idiots, and want more security theater in their lives to make them feel warm fuzzies.

Take the traditional concept of "pick two" from Price/Quality/Delivery-time and make it Price/Safety/Fun. I see most modern accomodations for safety as an opposition to the qualities that make vehicles enjoyable and aesthetically pleasing.

**** that. I want my Bronco to be fun.

SaFeTy iS OuR NoMbUr WoN pRiOrAty!

If it's the specs Ford provides to suppliers / partners I would certainly hope it's accurate. That seems pretty damn narrow to me, but par for the course with obnoxious accomodations for modern crash standards.

While the OP is being hyperbolic, it is an issue of the height of the glass or greenhouse, not of the cabin height. I can tell just looking at the stock images this design suffers from modern safety constraints drastically limiting visibility compared to vehicles of the past. I'd be more than...