When I ordered (Nov of '21) my 22 Bronco with the 2.3L there was no price difference on my build between the auto and the manual. Maybe that had to do with the Sasquatch package?
Although his orders overlapped a bit, I have a friend that has ordered (and would have received - he passed on one and took delivery of the other) TWO fully loaded 392 XR's since I ordered my base Bronco (yet to even be scheduled).
So as of today (8-17-22) my '22 order from November is still "in order processing." If the scheduling for the reminder of the year happened on the 15th, does that mean for certain I am being bumped to '23?
Damage is as damage does.
People a) see the sticker and b) form their own opinion about an 80% ADM relative to their own sentiment and experience with the American car market. Pretty simple.
The thing truly speaks for itself.
Yes, you did. The whole thing was pretty obvious from the affected nature of the OP's posts in both threads. Not sure who would have been so obtuse that they didn't immediately catch on, but who knows...
The fact that Omar is charging an 80% ADM on a Bronco he has "in stock" but is somehow also able to sell you one for MSRP is totally antithetical to the points he makes above. But whatever...
I understand what you are saying. I guess if you are left charging the required ADM anywhere you can get it in a wild free-for-all, that's just the way it is. However, having the Bronco bear an outsized portion of that burden due simply to its scarcity because of supply chain issues (as...
As a matter of percentage, are you charging the exact same ADM on EVERY car you offer for sale right now? Because if not, your argument that market forces are forcing you into charging ADMs sounds more than a little hollow...