Search results

Maybe Tesla can work on that after they figure out how to make a bumper that doesn't fall off if you hit a puddle. Baby steps haha

And upwards of 34 people were disappointed Lol. Nobody buys manuals anymore. I've driven manual all my life but autos are faster and more efficient than manuals now. Manual customers have to be enthusiasts, but how many enthusiasts want the slow version? My next car will be auto, maybe...

Job hunting? Xplan isn't that much savings, I wouldn't go way out of my way to get it There's a couple dealers on here taking reservations at less than xplan costs

Same width on both options?

On a track my 30 mpg car turns into a 8 mpg car.

Yup and nothing in the USA ever happened that would be horrific today... Nothing to see here, move along....... Glass houses yo

Mechanics are well known to be the best judges of style Lol But yeah the 2dr is better looking in my low style having opinion too

I'll be drinking rosé. Cheers!

I just think it's funny how many of you plan on sleeping in your cars Hotels are pretty useful IMO I guess if you end up homeless the 4dr would be more useful

It's not mainly diameter that causes the mpg dip It's the 255, 265, 285 mm wide instead of 315 wide Wider tire is harder to roll and harder to push through the air. 30-60 mm of extra width per tire is enough to reduce efficiency Think of how a road racing bike has skinny tires and a mountain...

Unpopular opinion The minivan is actually cool now, because soccer mom's are all driving explorers, pilots, X5, highlanders and the like. Power sliding doors are so cool, opening the door as you walk to the car is cool as hell for the passengers Also, for cargo hauling a minivan blows away an...

I think they certainly could be white....... Not sure I'm on board with that ?

I like the chrome door handles. EDIT... they white I thought OBX was supposed to have painted handles, but I probably stared too long at that tiny spec sheet Also, should be inside the garage not in front of it

Mpg will be worse with Sasquatch because the tires are much wider It's aerodynamics, more crap to push though the air and that costs fuel

Only 2 rear seat belts The width issue mentioned above

Those are the exact trips that eco mode has zero effect on Eco mode will not give better steady state freeway mileage It costs a certain amount of gas to cruise at 75 mph.... Pushing a button can't change that

You got it exactly Eco just gives changes the throttle curve, so if you ask for 30% it gives you 20%..... But if you need to get up to speed you will just push the throttle further and basically negate what eco mode does Eco mode does nothing to boost steady state efficiency Do you guys...

Modes are marketing garbage anyway You want the car to act differently then you use your feet differently All eco does is flatten the throttle curve a little, it doesn't magically give you better mpg

That's about 18.5 mpg, which is probably in the realm of accurate for a tank that's mostly burned on the freeway at reasonable speeds (y)

17 gallons but you can't realistically use the whole thing Realistic range could be as low as 200-250 miles between fuel stops. Ouch. I hadn't done the math on that until now.... Seems like people care more about range than mpg, that's going to annoy a lot of owners