Search results

Every day.

Wouldn't bother me if they made some of the shifts via button ala Roadranger. They should make the manual box the standard tranny and the auto the option like they do on the Mustang.

Without a SFA you can forget putting a plow on. The G550 is only 125k my late boss was going to buy one for a shop truck. I told him we should designate a parking spot for it,call it the G-spot.

Not the 460 hp, that was 2018

heres how it is: Was going to buy a new Mustang GT in the end of 2017, I put it off because the Coyote was going to be offered for 2018. Then they announced the Bronco,that got my interest. Been waiting and waiting and waiting. Almost pulled the trigger on a new Mustang last spring. Had...

SUVs have devolved into jacked up station wagons with awd. Mostly luxury, little sport, no utility.

Hackett lead to that share price.The fool doesn't have a clue.

1 tires wheels 2 gun rack 3 Winch 4 rear seat delte /removal 5 passenger ejector seat

misunderstood you, as most people are misunderstanding me. I thought Ford finally introduced a SUV that was true to the term.

thats a bad example, nothing wrong with plush, plenty wrong saying I have to want the same garbage every one else wants.

Its a car. we should have a choice.Ford should listen to a demographic that actually buys and drives their vehicles. There are ways of meeting the mandates without wrecking the interior. The Bronco is supposed to be a SUV not another mall roach.

Good news, the electronics fans would have the Bronco slushbox only

I didn'y say limit stuff, I said not put in features that are not appropriate or force us to accept things we don't want. make them options

If they get enough feedback or start listening to people who will actually buy vehicles they might change it. The screen doesn't need to take up so much of the dashboard or it can be hidden or drop the price a couple thousand and not include it. The huge screen in the Mustang was a deal breaker...

I made up my mind a long time ago, Hackett has to go. In order for the Bronco to be a market success it has to be configurable to just about any customers needs. I'm not wrong about what I want for myself,

They will make plenty off money provided we can opt out of the stuff we don't want and order the stuff we do want. But thats not how it works in the car game these days, they pander to a demographic. 45 % want a mall suv the rest want something in between a hard core crawler and luxury suv, but...

I work with them every day all day. I like to get away from them, especially in the car. The top comes off the Bronco, they need to what we call "harden" the display so it can last in the elements. Other wise you'll be replacing the screen on a regular basis and you shouldn't need to use it to...

We want a competent,capable, reliable offroader, if you want doodads that are useless out in the woods go buy an Escalade. Ford makes pelnty of mall suvs, lets not ruin the Bronco. but thats where its headed.

Don't have grand kids. Thats why I'm getting a two door bronco with rear seat delete or its getting thrown out, and if i did have grand kids they would know enough to respect their elders I want a nice looking dashboard, not a screen in the middle of everything, I don't want necessary...

Personally I rather have a reasonable size NA engine for offroad than a hairdryer engine. You want good torque off idle not in the 4000-5000 rpm range. Ford is playing the same HP game as everyone else, Small displacement turbo motor, with no boost at low rpm uses little fuel, high rpm boost...