Search results

This was close to the build I was contemplating (with a black hard top of some sort).

That's been my thought for some time. Who is taking all of these pictues? Is it that hard to get straight-on pics. 90% of the time it's some off-angle, partial picture.

Yikes. Too red....

See, now was that really so hard for Ford to communicate in direct fashion with end customers? The statement is appreciated and Ford should do more of that.

Looks terrible, as does the pre-faded gray roof.

So let me see if I understand this right. What is the point of the word "allocations" in the context of ordering a new Bronco? If it's not used in the traditional sense, how is it used? Is it something like this: Let's say I was (in terms of time) one of the first 25% of people making a...

I was originally thinking white. I don't know -- not sure if it's the grey roof against all of the other black trim, the black wheels, the overly-segmented roof, the angle of the pic or what, but doesn't look all that great...

Ford shouldn't even bother with any of the 255 tire variations. Lame and the look is terrible. The 265/70/17 tire should be the base apparatus. Then offer the 33's (on more models besides the Badlands), and end with Sasquatch.

I guess so. But the easy solution is to make the passenger side front seat with some manual features. In the real world that's where people would pile in from. No need to dumb down the driver seat.

Nice catch. So, it appears you can get electronic seats on the Badlands 4 door. But, why would the 2 door be treated differently? I guess Ford's odd trim specs makes my 2 door / 4 door dilemna easier. 4 door for the better / adjustable seats.... Now, loading up a 4 door Badlands one is...

So, I read a lengthy post elsewhere and a fellow was saying the trims with the rubber floor wouldn't be able to be optioned with electrically adjustable seats -- just the full manual version (which I think likely suck). I hadn't considered that but it sounds plausible. The issue (for me) is...

I think it was akin to bait and switch. Basically Ford used that killer interior to generate excitement and (I assume) it will not be made available. It would be one thing if it was in a concept car, but it's entirely different when that interior is shown in your big reveal to generate...

Not much.

Does anyone know (or has anyone heard) if either the 2.3 or 2.7 have any known, or unexplainable, or frequently arising or other fundamentally bad traits like the Mustang 5.0 and it's infamous BBQ tick?

I don't understand why Ford didn't make this the FE interior, or better yet a Lux option or something for a top leather trim. This looks great. How do you go from this to that blue abomination? What is the matter with them. Ford needs to get with the program.

I agree, that looks horrible (particulary that two-tone leather / shabby looking fabric). Only Ford or GM could come up with something like that.

The more I look at the lack of interior space I think I'm flipping over to the 4 door variant. I wish they could add ventilated seats to the leather / lux package. Lux has about everything else one might want. Looking at the pics and design, and quality control aside, this thing looks like...

IMO the smaller wheel arch flares (seen here) look better than what you get with the Sasquatch package. The later version IMO sticks out too far and just looks awkward. This version (w/33s) doesn't look over-done and is proportional looking.

That right there ^^^ with the 33" all-terrain's. Perfect size for great look and daily driveability (if that's a word).

Busch league roll-out and customer communication (and managment of same).