Search results

They can all do the same things, with varying degrees of success, but are not all the same customer. Different jobs, different tools.

Even the average person who doesn't recognize Mustang as an icon and isn't a fan of all things automotive will intrinsically recognize a substantial difference between the two products despite them wearing the same small iconic albeit plastic jewelry on the grille. Sort of like calling the...

I wonder how much of this same type of discussion went on before the rebirth of the Mustang. And in the end, how many naysayers were vindicated, how many fanbois were disappointed. Everyone has their own personal threshold of how much vintage and how much modern they want to see in the new...

Some very informative posts here! Thanks for the info, valuable knowledge for going forward on Excursion upgrades and a refresh on my '71 Bronco.

The portals will more than make up for that extra inch. :clap:

I don't know if I've ever used the word "horsepower" in the same sentence as the phrase "too much", but this is pushing the line some. I can get into enough trouble (with both statutory law and the laws of physics) with the mild 351W in mine. Still, an amazing example a beautiful one-off...

KC probably isn't a lot of fun in December, but we could call it an "order party!"

Seems a little tall for the One Without a Name. Either it's the One Without a Name and it's going to be larger than I anticipated, or it's something else.

:cwl::crackup:

Incredible.

You make enough mistakes, one would think you could gracefully handle righteous criticism by now. That's okay, you'll get more practice here.

I don't think there's sufficient data from this prototype/desert racer to draw a clear picture of what the production vehicle will look like or come equipped with. I'm going to have to see and drive pretty much any new production vehicle before I commit $45k+ to it. Looks cool, maybe gives a...

You define "trolling" as attempting to discern if data presented is factual or speculative?

So, you know nothing. Understood.

I haven't posted anything that asserts the Bronco has any specific measurements. You did. I'm only trying to assess what is fact and what is speculation. That you take it as a personal affront is unfortunate.

Can you reference these reports, or are they internal FoMoCo data?

Just in length, or in other dimensions as well? And... I'm going to use my brain and attempt to deduce that you mean the new 4-door Bronco. Any speculation on the 2-door?

WOOHOO!!! We're getting a full-size Bronco!!!

You specifically stated "2/4-door". There is absolutely zero "deduction" required. I questioned it, and rather kindly, I think. You could have said, "oops, haha, that was a mistake", but instead you showed your colors. And did it again in this response.

Well, that would be the reason I questioned it in the first place. Thank you for correcting your erroneous and misleading post. I was taking it on faith that you had some factual information, as you stated your case with authority. It is now clear that any trust in your knowledge was grossly...