Second Thoughts on Manual Transmission

[mC.242]

After being pretty set on the base (with the auto standard) I'm now back to the manual as my preferred choice. I was considering a base 4dr, but looking at the gear/crawl ratios I think my plan to upgrade to 33's would kinda suck. Now I know why the AT is standard on the base, because anyone who looks at this would be crazy to pick the 2.3L. I might still do a base with the 2.7L upgrade, but no way I'm getting a base with the 2.3L/AT. Now thinking BB with the 2.3L and MT to get the better gearing.

Sponsored

 

[centra28]

All the praise for the 2.7 really pulls at me , BUT as I have stated in many other threads.... HoosierDaughter (14) really wants to learn a manual and she is excited about this new Bronco also, so, for me it is about making a cherished memory that we'll carry with us for our life times.

I agree with all of the arguments against the MT for this vehicle. However, this is the one thing still pulling me towards the idea. It may be a completely impractical and romanticized idea to go with the MT, but my 16 yo daughter is chomping at the bit for me to teach her how to drive one. The way things are going for automobiles this might be my only chance to pass on this life skill. I still fondly reflect on the moments of my mother teaching me how to drive in her little MT Ford Probe.

The way I see it, I am teaching her how to drive MT on this Bronco or some DB boy is going to take up the task down the road somewhere.

 

[centra28]

I agree with all of the arguments against the MT for this vehicle. However, this is the one thing still pulling me towards the idea. It may be a completely impractical and romanticized idea to go with the MT, but my 16 yo daughter is chomping at the bit for me to teach her how to drive one. The way things are going for automobiles this might be my only chance to pass on this life skill. I still fondly reflect on the moments of my mother teaching me how to drive in her little MT Ford Probe.

The way I see it, I am teaching her how to drive MT on this Bronco or some DB boy is going to take up the task down the road somewhere.

You know, but to do this I have to make a lot of sacrifices. I was dead set on the 2.7 v6 so I'll be sacrificing the power. I'll also be sacrificing convenience. Do you smoke? Drink coffee, play on your phone while driving (you SOB)? Kiss that good bye. Also driving in traffic will suck.

Is it reasonable to get a MT transmission? Not at all. but YOLO?

In my twenties I bought a MT Camaro and booooy was it fun! One the first day I owned it I spun out on the highway which was covered in snow and ice (a story for another time). One time I was out w/ my GF and I slipped on the ice and sprang my left ankle. I tried but I just couldn't put any pressure on the clutch w/o immense pain. My GF had no idea how to drive a MT. I was stuck in the passenger seat trying to teach her to drive a MT while I was wincing in pain (both physically and mentally) as she continuously ground the gears. That was NOT a fun memory of having a MT. So pack that away for what it's worth.

 

[Drafting_Monkey]

I agree with all of the arguments against the MT for this vehicle. However, this is the one thing still pulling me towards the idea. It may be a completely impractical and romanticized idea to go with the MT, but my 16 yo daughter is chomping at the bit for me to teach her how to drive one. The way things are going for automobiles this might be my only chance to pass on this life skill. I still fondly reflect on the moments of my mother teaching me how to drive in her little MT Ford Probe.

The way I see it, I am teaching her how to drive MT on this Bronco or some DB boy is going to take up the task down the road somewhere.

I am in the same boat. Want to teach my 16yr old daughter how to drive a MT. I haven't had a manual trans since 2007 and I'm getting one with the Bronco because they may not be around much longer. I have a car already that gets 50+MPG so I'm not concerned about commuting in this thing. Getting a MT also helps with the options on my builds. Keeps it simple as I can't have packages on either a Base/BB/BD.

 

[Drex]

My first thought was that being able to buy a non-Jeep SUV in a manual was going to make one awesome Cactus Green fun machine!

But I did have a second thought that crept in and turned me away from that...

After weighing all the options and trade-offs necessary to get it from Ford, I changed my mind and now believe a Velocity Blue manual non-Jeep would be even better!

 

[Petey]

Going back to a manual transmission is one of the big reasons why I'm excited to get the Bronco. I would love to get the 2.7L but the 2.3L will be fine for almost everything I plan on doing.

 

[DrewBronc21]

It kills me that Ford didnt offer the 2.7 Manual but it would probably kill me more to be forced to drive an auto Bronco. A real sport transmission with paddle shifters might have changed my mind a bit but I have an Auto Camry Hybrid daily and its Boring.

2dr 2.3 Basemansquatch for me. 4.7 gears will move it quite well in addition to a tune for another 80-100 HP and torque.

 

[RiverRat001]

Welp... can’t argue with the logic. It’s harder, slower, outdated, and locks you out of a lot of nice options.

But for $50k you can get something faster, more efficient, more luxurious, or even better off-road (dirt bike, SxS, built old jeep + a truck to pull it). I’m buying a Bronco because of how it makes me feel. I feel more engaged and more satisfied going “slow” rowing my own.

 

[TommyBronco]

Agree. if no manual, I wouldn't be interested in the Bronco. While I wish the 2.7 came in a manual, I'm more than fine with the 2.3.

 

[HoosierDaddy]

I agree with all of the arguments against the MT for this vehicle. However, this is the one thing still pulling me towards the idea. It may be a completely impractical and romanticized idea to go with the MT, but my 16 yo daughter is chomping at the bit for me to teach her how to drive one. The way things are going for automobiles this might be my only chance to pass on this life skill. I still fondly reflect on the moments of my mother teaching me how to drive in her little MT Ford Probe.

The way I see it, I am teaching her how to drive MT on this Bronco or some DB boy is going to take up the task down the road somewhere.

Probably my favorite comment regarding this was something to the effect of ....
"I won't have to worry about most of her friends wanting to drive it." LMAO!

HoosierDaughter just turned 15 and will get her learners permit any day now !!!!
We (the family) will all have a good discussion come order time now .... that 2.7 is really calling me. I can load up a Base Squatch,V6 etc for under or right at $40k! Pretty happy about that.

I see the lights turn green and people just sit there daydreaming for half the length of the light.

I currently drive a Mazda 3 6MT. It's got a weak 2.5l NA which peaks out at 184hp. I'm always the first off the line. And in my past life, i.e. pre-pandemic, I would routinely pass high hp, luxury and supercars.

Exact same experience with my NA 2.5L auto OUTBACK. Subie does a great job with their gearing, plus paying attention at the light ....God how I hate being the second or third car back.

 

[Funksurfsoul]

All this talk about how the 2.3 might not have enough power sounds like bullshit to me. The 2.3l has several videos of tune-ups and things you can do to it to get an outrageous amount of power from it. Ford has already mentioned something like “we’ve seen people get an absurd amount of horsepower and torque out of these engines” which if you search online there are tons of videos of people pushing these far past the 275hp 310.
I’m actually stoked for the 7 speed manual and that they’re using a tried, tested and true engine. Even with my Sasquatch package, this thing is gonna do just fine.

 

[Laminar]

The automatics that can actually "shift faster" to gain track speed advantage over a human/manual set up are not ordinary torque converter automatics, but rather DCT transmissions that are actually a manual transmission in gearbox design with dual clutched input shafts to speed shifting. That is not the 10-speed in the New Bronco.

Untrue.

2018 Mustang GT with a stick:
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a14500071/2018-ford-mustang-gt-manual-test-review/

0-60 in 4.3 seconds, quarter mile in 12.6@115

2018 Mustang GT with Ford's 10 speed auto:
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a24847025/2018-ford-mustang-automatic-transmission-performance/

0-60 in 3.8 seconds, quarter mile in 12.1@120

The very same 10 speed that Ford is putting in the Bronco managed to knock a half second off of the 0-60 and quarter miles times in the Mustang. The latest generation of torque-converter autos are very very good.

 

[BigFootie]

And here I thought the manual transmission was a no charge option for an anti-theft device.

 

[Efthreeoh]

Untrue.

2018 Mustang GT with a stick:
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a14500071/2018-ford-mustang-gt-manual-test-review/

0-60 in 4.3 seconds, quarter mile in 12.6@115

2018 Mustang GT with Ford's 10 speed auto:
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a24847025/2018-ford-mustang-automatic-transmission-performance/

0-60 in 3.8 seconds, quarter mile in 12.1@120

The very same 10 speed that Ford is putting in the Bronco managed to knock a half second off of the 0-60 and quarter miles times in the Mustang. The latest generation of torque-converter autos are very very good.

So just a few things. I've not checked for sure, because I'm not going to get into an internet bench racing argument, but regarding the Mustang, you are comparing a 6-sp manual to a 10 speed automatic, so the gear ratios are different between the two transmissions, which can make up some of the 500 milliseconds in 0 -60 time in addition to shift speed. Second, DTC transmissions shift faster than most of the best automatics, which is what I said. Third, the version of the Ford 10-speed auto probably has different gear ratios than the version used in the Mustang, and I'd bet the New Bronco version has different shift programming than the version in the Mustang, since the New Bronco is a truck primarily designed for off-roading and the Mustang GT is designed for street bragging rights against the Camaro.

But none of that crap contradicts the point I made, which is in real terms, the faster shifting capability of the 10-speed makes no major difference in how the New Bronco will perform on the street or trail in either real-world MPG, vehicle speed or driving dynamics. And more to my point, the 10-speed doesn't know when to shift based on when the driver may want it to shift in relation to how he is driving in the traffic environment he is in. So in real-word conditions, where the 10-sp auto is in high gear and low engine RPM to maximize fuel efficiency, if the driver wants to dig into the engines powerband to make a driving move, he can anticipate and time a gear change, where the 10-sp auto's software takes a few milliseconds to figure out it needs a lower gear to get the engine power requested by the driver's right foot. So I'd wager the increased speed of the 10-sp auto's shift is out paced by the driver's decision to put the manual in the correct gear ahead of time and in conjunction to his intended driving move.

 

[Efthreeoh]

All this talk about how the 2.3 might not have enough power sounds like bullshit to me. The 2.3l has several videos of tune-ups and things you can do to it to get an outrageous amount of power from it. Ford has already mentioned something like “we’ve seen people get an absurd amount of horsepower and torque out of these engines” which if you search online there are tons of videos of people pushing these far past the 275hp 310.
I’m actually stoked for the 7 speed manual and that they’re using a tried, tested and true engine. Even with my Sasquatch package, this thing is gonna do just fine.

I agree with you. I think the 2.3L's specs will adequately power the New Bronco. Maybe with the auto and 'Squatch with 35"s it might be a little lagging, but I'd bet the diff ratio makes up for it. I've not researched the 2.3L much. My unanswered question is how the manual trans will deal with turbo lag. Computer controlled drivetrains with automatics can compensate for turbo lag.

Sponsored