2020 Ford Bronco Concept Rendering

[JimmyDean]

length is a slave to the 'widebody' design...I presume for enhanced safety. Gen1 Bronco 68.5"; my old S10 Blazer 64.7"; 90's Defender 70.5"; 2020 Wrangler 73.8". New Bronco prolly 74"-75". Gotta add length or you'd be driving a cube.

I agree, I'm also fine with going back to narrow. But wider means better rollover protection, along with suspension upgrades, handling nannies, etc. Longer typically helps with efficiency, and handling and safety for the casual driver (90%+).

Sometimes I just think it would be nice to have a more modern enthusiast vehicle, that doesn't cost 75k+. like a GT350R, or the 'new' EBs with the 5.0 coyote.

Sponsored

 

[PNW_Bronco94]

That's *all* you have to say about this??

 

[Stampede.Offroad]

Close. The pitch of the front edge of the rear wheel well needs to match the pitch of the rear edge of the front wheel well.

Take the back seat out and put a doggo in there. :sun:

 

[The Pope]

....Only thing would be I’d like to see the spare tire upright not angled like it is.

I guess that you two didn't take into consideration that this rendering was possibly of the BroncoBronco with several body parts removed and could have been drawn the way that it is to give an example of how someone might configure it when they prefer to run without the body parts.....

I personally like it and who's to "Officially Say" that the spare will not be designed so that it could easily be tilted like this.....

Just saying...

 

[Nickp]

I personally like it and who's to "Officially Say" that the spare will not be designed so that it could easily be tilted like this.....

Just saying...

That would actually be pretty cool for departure angle...

 

[BuckWildOffRoad]

yeah, I was going for it looking cool.

 

[Randy92Fox]

I think Chrispy is just saying you're onto something without actually saying it due to his proximity to the product. At least that's what I'm hoping...

 

[The Pope]

Yes, I'm aware of that , but @BuckedOff-Road wasn't going for "actual", as I don't think that @BuckedOff-Road has seen the Actual BroncoBronco.
@BuckedOff-Road is also doing a AWESOME Job with the renderings, so we should give them the credit that they deserve.

 

[BuckWildOffRoad]

Yes, I'm aware of that , but @BuckedOff-Road wasn't going for "actual", as I don't think that @BuckedOff-Road has seen the Actual BroncoBronco.
@BuckedOff-Road is also doing a AWESOME Job with the renderings, so we should give them the credit that they deserve.

Thank you!

 

[Uncle Gump]

Vehicle(s)… means more then one.

Hmmmm

 

[TeocaliMG]

I don't hate the stepped beltline but from what I have seen I think that was only on the R for ingress/egress. There are also aero elements to the R design that obviously wont be on the production version. Safe to say they took some liberties. Overall I would say this is the closest render yet based on key design elements. Next I would like to see it done photo realistic like the forum renders

Great work!

 

[Stampede.Offroad]

I don't hate the stepped beltline but from what I have seen I think that was only on the R for ingress/egress. There are also aero elements to the R design that obviously wont be on the production version. Safe to say they took some liberties...

No egress hatch in the roof like a school bus for the production Bronco? That's a deal breaker.

 

[PAPA old school]

get rid of the purple, and 2.7 isnt anything to brag about. who wants anyone to know "WOW I COULD OF HAD A V8" Or at least a V6
Rendering is cool though!

Sponsored