Search results

Would like to purchase NON SAS fender flare. Thanks

I have not found any that are made for a standard flare. All I have seen is for a SAS flare and that sticks out to far. The search continues.

These are a nice looking product from a solid company in my opinion. The issue is a one size fits all for any of these mud flaps. Most are made for a SAS flare, with a standard flare most these mud flaps stick out to far. I wish these were offered for a standard flare.

That looks really great. I would be curious to see what your CV angle is at full droop? Adding an inch of length from the top spacer will be close to CV joint bind I believe. Will the front CV joints hold up at this angle? I am no expert just asking.

Maybe Ford can get a replacement hard top side panel that was cracked upon arrival. Two months later and still has not been approved for a replacement.

Ok this is my thought as well. Would not the taller spring extend the shock to the fully extended range while at ride height? Also if you add a longer spring to help provide lift would that not increase the preload of the shock essentially making the ride stiffer. I ask these questions not to be...

How can this provide lift without extending strut length? I assume it provides lift by increasing preload to not let the strut settle as much and thereby providing lift? Would this not effect ride, making it stiffer? I am asking because I don't understand how the ride cannot be stiffer. Thanks...

So if a guy only needs to level his Bronco due to adding a winch and bumper I imagine these will get the job done for the front. My question is can the back be installed without adding any additional lift. According to the manufacture it looks as if it is about 1.5" minimum lift to the back.

That is a great look. Have you buy chance looked at the CV angle at full droop? I have been debating the exact setup but was concerned about CV bind at full droop. Thanks for posting

I sent in a ticket to Forscan a few days ago regarding this issue, waiting to hear back.

Mine showed up cracked at the dealership. Let's see if it is covered under warranty or will it be said this is normal from the factory? I am betting Ford tells me tough sh_t, take it or leave it.

Thank you, I will wait or try to source the 2.3.49 version.

I have a 2022 Bronco, I have had no issue using Forscan for any procedure with the exception of writing to the PSCM module. When I try to write to it I get the same "service procedure has been interrupted" error. I am not sure why I get that error only to the PSCM module. I am using version 2.3.48

I am sorry if this has been answered. Does anyone know the extended length of the Badlands and the SAS front coil over?

Has anyone been able to source some extended brake line. I would like plus two inches longer than OEM. Normally this is not an issue however for the Bronco it seems to be.

Yes sir, the dealer can see that it is still at the factory and has not been released. Yet another member’s Bronco was built the same day as mine and shipped two weeks ago.

Would it be considered normal for your completed Bronco to be sitting at the factory for three weeks now since it was built and still not be shipped? Did it get damaged or something like that?

Blend date for me was 08-03-2022 as well, build #111/1026 What a coincidence

Ok thanks, you sorta scared the crap out of me. Supposedly mine is built and waiting release from the factory to go on a train to Chicago then Portland. Who knows how long that may take. Just a little leery at this point. On a side note how did some members manage to get a photo of their Bronco...

What does that mean? I received it as well. Oh wait do I want to know.