Search results

Come on people ....no one is intentionally pulling chains. It’s the world we live in now thanks to Covid. They are doing their best to get the trucks to us. You either love the Bronco enough to wait it out or you don’t. I for one have been waiting for this for a long time. And will continue till...

Well said.

I’ve seen the pre production interior of the ones at both Super Cells. The MGV Badlands was very nice. I know a lot of people aren’t a fan of the orange stitching but it didn’t look bad with the Area 51 paint. I’d prefer the same stitch color as body paint but oh well. Looks good.

I hope not (my opinion). They already did this once and didn’t really pan out. And I had a 93 Bronco. The whole purpose in bringing this back was getting back to its roots heritage. IMO

Im sorry, did I miss something? Has Ford changed their position on a later delivery of A MT Sasquatch?

Haha. Yes they are aren’t they? But you are correct..... we can’t get a mid package with a MT (Squatch or otherwise) on a BD. Sucks. Forcing me to go to a BL.

That’s not true about auto and squatch. MT Squatch is late availability and I’m willing to wait for it.

I’m the exact same but I also want MT. And I can’t get Mid package with MT on BD so I’m looking at Squatch on Badlands to get a Mid. Ugh.

I talked the Ford guy while they were in TN. The middle section can not be removed with the roof rack on.

It’s a great app. Use it on my ranger.

Today’s 4 cylinder is way different than 20 years ago. Old school mentality. My old ranger 3.0 6 cylinder from the 90s had less Hp and torque compared to this 2.3 liter. A lot less. Granted the 2.7 v6 is awesome.

It would only let me vote once but I have two reservations. One for my daughter and one for me. Will be getting both at Stephens. My second is mine ...... 7-19...... Badlands 2 door

You may be right on the 2.7 with the lower torque. I hope it works great in the Bronco. I just really want that manual. I live in a rural area and it won’t be my daily driver so it’s perfect situation for me.

Awesome. Thanks for sharing.

Gotcha. My college roommate at the time had a Mazda and they had such similar features and looks. But I loved that truck. It was a good one.

Likewise. My first new vehicle was a 93 Ranger. Basically the entire truck was. Mazda. That MT was awesome though. Put 200k mikes on that thing and only needed to ever replace the radiator and a bunch of the fog lights.

I agree. I have the new Ranger now with the 2.3 auto....... it has plenty of power and pep. I love the engine. It’s the transmission that I do not love. I mentioned this on another thread but worth mentioning again.... it wants to stay in the higher gears all the time and and sluggish down...

I’m sorry but just because you feel it’s a nonsense question doesn’t mean that others don’t feel different. There was really no need to reply with that statement IMO. Maybe this person has never had a remote start vehicle before and just didn’t know how it all worked. This is a platform to get...

Two reservations: 7/17 7/19 Switched on 11/12 Kingsport TN

Exactly. I have 2019 Ranger now. The second it hits the 1/4 tank level I get the low gas alarm and says I have 40 miles to empty. But above half tank it goes sooooo slow. Still get 350-390 gal per tank