Search results

That front axle shaft was defective on that Bronco. Haven’t seen anything about the tie rod in the snow.

I haven’t see anyone having an issue running less than true 37’s

Top off and doors off it’s better than a convertible IMO

You say that as if Jeeps don’t need upgraded steering to run huge tires. It’s part of the game.

Congratulations on your Fiat purchase

Looks better and keeps stuff from flying out.

I think it’d have to be front doors only to not look weird. Annndddd I need those

They were sarcastic questions. You guys are the ones who think you should get all the parts to run huge tires on a stock vehicle for because you paid money for it. Zero logic.

$100 per Bronco built for something 1000% unnecessary for a stock Bronco. That’s 20 million dollars for Ford on 200,000 Bronco’s being built. Why would they do that? It makes zero sense. You have to upgrade parts when you go to bigger, heavier tires. It’s common knowledge in the off-road community.

You answered your own question in the end of your comment. Lol

Or you find a thread that’s relevant to you and don’t care how old it is. Weird people get bothered by “resurrected” threads on a forum.

Thats ridiculous logic. Why aren’t we getting 40’s standard for 55K? Why don’t we get a Ferrari for 55K?

It does have the same type exhaust system from the F-150 Raptor. Still a waste of money if you’re gonna do a build though.

Raptor is cool if you plan on leaving it stock. Otherwise my Bronco will end up with much more street presence than the Raptor plus better suspension.

Why should equipment that’s only needed when you upgrade to bigger, heavier tires be standard?

Yea the repeaters are the most common way cars are stolen these days.

Any pics of the rack on the Bronco?

Yessir

Thats definitely a decrease in approach angle but not as bad as I thought. If it only worked for the 2.7

Is the carbon vs metal just for looks? The weight savings can’t be significant.