Search results

Key phrase; "for an SUV" It's not a performance CAR. It may be a performance SUV, but that'll still always be subpar in comparison to even a mild performance car. Performance SUVs aren't impressive. It just means they were able to load a shitload of power into a big, bloated pile of shit...

Everyone keeps bringing up these examples, but keeps forgetting about the one thing they ALL had in common that the general public actually cares about... FIXED ROOFS Jeep is able to sell a lifestyle not because of it's SFA, but because it's the ONLY vehicle on the market that offers an open...

The Mach-E isn't a performance car. And yes, the Supra is a shit value, but still better than the Mach E... at least in can perform in more than ONE metric (0-60)

my stock is about to get sold off. I was sticking with the sinking ship in faith that Ford could come up with something, and instead they decide to bastardize the ONE thing that has kept me loving Ford. I no longer have any desire to support the company

Boy, I really hope this doesn’t mean we’re getting big ol goofy round housings... If you don’t mind KC, could you go look at my “I suck at photoshop” thread and share some thoughts?

The Mach-E community is going to be just as cancerous as the Tesla community. If you don’t know what I’m talking about, go join a Tesla “enthusiast” Facebook page and you’ll see I even saw people on the Mach-E forum talking about joining Mustang forums just to piss Mustang owners off... this is...

Sure, but you still have to pay TTL on the vehicle itself... so even with the tax credit (assuming you get the max) that’s still a $56k vehicle. Definitely not worth it

Yep, and that’s exactly why that’s what I want!

Thanks! I imagine there will be... maybe the (R)aptor version will have a red R, and then all the raptor owners can yell at the non-raptor owners for having the red R (just like GT350 and 350R)

...but I whipped up a couple “renders” of the Bronco R with some headlights and a grille. I find I always have trouble explaining what exactly I expect to see from the Bronco headlights and what I want to see, so here are my ideas. First, for the C-clamp squad: Next, what I could realistically...

Likes: Pretty much everything about the BroncoR dislikes: knowing that the production Bronco isn’t going to look that good hopes: For the production Bronco; Low slung roofline of the R Wide like the R Molded fender flares like the R Stepped window line like the R Grille like the R Fully...

1. we aren’t talking tire wear, we’re talking tire heat management. As a tire gets beyond its heat threshold, it loses grip. Additional weight pushes it beyond that threshold faster. I’ve been wanting a smaller, lighter Mustang since S197 for this very reason 2. talking about 70% of Mustangs...

I feel the wheelwells are slightly TOO pronounced. Also, I think the width will be a bit greater. The windshield looks too tall, and I think the stepped window line down the side drops a bit too low. And the grille is too low on the front end... less downward slope to the hood, grille a bit...

The assertion that all that matters for a car to "outperform" another is 0-60 time and skidpad numbers is indicitave of why Tesla finds so many fools to sell their subpar products to An EV MIGHT be able to hit close in 0-60, but nothing beyond that. Skidpad numbers aren't all that indicitave of...

Yeah, not going to happen. That would require a next-gen Mustang with a SIGNIFICANT downgrade in every performance, in which case, refer to my original point of "phasing out the real Mustang"

I didn’t say anywhere in my post that they announced it. But if you simply read between the lines, you can see that this is likely the intent. Ford has made a point to kill off ALL passenger cars, they are “transitioning to a mobility company rather than an automotive company” by their own...

This is sort of the point... Ford has already gotten out of the passenger car business. This makes the Mustang a single platform, high-cost-low-reward vehicle. Now, when this crossover "mustang" that can share its platform across MULTIPLE different vehicles takes off in sales, what do you think...

I took it as "Don't go and blow your money on something else, keep saving it because a manual is coming" But if that's not the case, then consider me another lost customer

Agreed. They already went too far with the tri bar taillights... if they put a pony on it, I have little faith left in Ford

because tons of people on this forum (including 1 in this thread) are saying they want the new Bronco to basically be a carbon copy of the EB because they want that “60s-70s feel” but don’t want to pay for an EB, yet don’t seem to understand that they can get an EB for probably around the same...