Search results

I think so, I think you're right, but I'm not familiar with the Jeep auto.

I think 3.73 and 33" tires is marginal. I ran that set up for years and was disappointed with the crawl ratio (2.72 t-case). Lower (numerically higher) gearing would be preferable off road.

The Bronco has lost its shine for me, as a matter of fact I hate the Bronco now.

When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

That's a great price! Congrats.

My opinion is that Ford built a disposable engine with the eco boost and because most people dont keep vehicles for decades you wont be disappointed, because you'll have traded it in or sold it before it becomes too much money to maintain. Someone else will buy your problem and will replace the...

I like the BFG All-Terrain KO2. Look for the mountain/snowflake designation. Just look for the stock size for your vehicle. Tire Rack is a good resource, but there are others, Discount Tire for example. 3-Peak Mountain Snowflake Rating (exceeding the Rubber Manufacturer Association's...

As of Feb 2021, https://fordauthority.com/2021/02/feds-end-investigation-into-ford-emissions-fuel-economy-testing/ Looks like the Department of Justice dropped the criminal investigation, but there are still multiple class-action lawsuits (since combined), and the EPA and Canada are still...

I've been driving my Ford truck more lately. When I switch to the g/f 4Runner, I keep over-braking. If you think Tacoma/4Runner brakes suck, they don't...compared to Ford.

If nothing else, you should be seeing auto reviews online and in print prior to September. You'll know then how it compares in real-world driving. So, that's good :) The 4Runner and Wrangler are both known quantities, and both have very reliable drivetrains. The 4.0L and the 3.6L are both...

Yep. Ford could have given us the same economy at less complexity and expense. It may have been at the expense of max power, but that just shows they are trying to win a marketing race, hype, not produce the best vehicle for the customer. They want to win short term customers, and higher profits.

Yeah, that's too small for 33" or 35" tires. I bet they upgrade them next year. I read the Wrangler is 12.9" front/rear, and the Sahara and Rubicon get heavier duty than the standard 12.9" so I'm sure Ford will follow suit.

It has very little practical use, just like gas cans on the back but, for that one time.... I carried an empty Jerry can for years on my Jeep, and empty Rotopax on the motorcycle. Almost no one will ever need it. The Titan comes with a siphon to get it into the tank.

That's nice too because you just leave it empty and out of the way 99% of the time.

Because you were wrong, with attitude. Why not just be an adult about it.

They do it for diesel. Not for gas. "Gas" tanks are part of the emissions/EVAP system. Call Titan and ask :rolleyes: then be an adult and apologize publicly.

The answer is no. There will be auxiliary tanks, separet to the fuel system (think gas cans, Rotopax, plastic tire insert deals) but not bigger aftermarket replacement fuel tanks. Gas and diesel fuel systems are certified completely different and making a different "gas" tank is too much of a...

But not.in EPA mpg mileage which is what this thread is about. The point is a 2.3 or 2.7 should be getting better MILEAGE than 15 - 20 year old tech.

When I worked closely with body shops, it wasn't uncommon for there to be no parts available due to limited production, or it was a "hot" vehicle and they didn't have "extras" for collision repair. Wait times could be months and months.

At least. They won't produce "aftermarket" or replacments until they fill the orders going down the assembly line, which they won't do for a looonnnggg time.