A. Painted Jeep flares would scratch exactly the same as my Mustang’s painted quarter panels would
B. I’m failing to see how that’s any easier than this:
Judging by the fact that when the BroncoR prototype was released, there was only 1 person I counted who didn’t like the looks... the rest...
I’m really not understanding the whole “ease of modifying” argument... like, these style flares make modification MORE difficult, not less. With standard metal flares, adding cheap looking flares like the ones on the Bronco would mean cutting sheet metal with a grinder and bolting on plastic...
Maintain? Why the hell do you need to maintain fenders? And besides, the ABS fenders will sunfade FAR before metal fenders would, so really, the shitty plastic needs MORE maintenance
pretty sure if you smack a rock with ABS OR metal, it’s going to be trashed either way, so “durability” has no...
For the millionth time on this forum... people don’t want a fucking wrangler clone. If they wanted a wrangler, they’d buy a fucking wrangler. People want an IMPROVEMENT over the wrangler
Yeah, I hate the “tack-on” fender flare look and wish they would’ve gone with more of a molded fender look... hell, if nothing else, they could’ve made the rear fenders more easily removable (more like front fenders) and placed all the structural metal underneath (again, like front fenders)...
That’s what I wish they would’ve done with the “Mustang Mach-E” moniker. They could’ve named that fucking crossover ANYTHING else and it would sell better seeing as it wouldn’t have pissed off Mustang fans
So we can already see you're a troglodyte, but lets dig deeper
"crank walking" all the way down that 1/4 mile faster than any auto you own, and that's the point of my post. Until you have an auto that's THAT fast, you have no place telling someone "autos are faster" because your pathetic ass...
Really though, let’s get back on topic. We don’t wanna look like the SFA guys turning every thread into an auto vs manual debate
I definitely am not a fan of how much the back end looks like a Jeep, and the fender flares certainly do it no favors. I can’t wait to replace them when I get my Bronco
So ultimately, this sounds to me more like a very specific scenario being pawned off as ALWAYS being the case
"AUTOS ARE FASTER!"
*if in the same car equipped exactly the same driven in the same conditions with drivers of the exact same skill level driving at the same place at the same time*...
I think you’re missing the point. Sure, all of this is true. But my point is, if you aren’t at that highest level, saying “autos are faster” is simply a bullshit scapegoat. if your car doesn’t have every single measure taken to make it faster, then there’s no reason to bash someone else for also...
Who’s worked up? I’m just talking facts... if you’re not faster than the fastest manual, then that means there are manuals faster than you... in other words, “autos are faster” is a load of shit because there’s most certainly a manual faster than your slushbox ?
This justification always cracks me up. Once YOU own an auto that’s faster than this, you can use that as your justification. Until then, there are PLENTY of manuals out there faster than your slushbox
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dragtimes.com/blog/worlds-fastest-7-second-dsm/amp
Also...
Without having much reference point, the height and length look good, but width worries me. That’s my biggest issue with it being based on a midsize... the Ranger feels a bit too narrow inside for my taste. With this being based off the ranger platform but having flared fenders, it has me...
Okay, so thoughts...
Swing gate + roof mounted rear window + straight vertical rear roof = holy shit that looks like a Jeep clone in the back
headlights look different from the ones we saw the other day... maybe those were the premium LEDs and these are the base headlights?
Power bulge on...