Search results

It's infuriating. The media is determined to kill this economy this election year. Literally screwing the lives of hundreds of thousands of older folk who'd saved for decades to try and have a decent standard of living in retirement. Putting people out of work, etc. It's criminal.

I was only referring to the Nostalgia of wanting a V8 like the original had. Point being, sure it's not a V8, but other than 2 cylinders and the great sound, we're giving up nothing with a modern V6. Lol not a big deal.

Lol. Shocking that the numbers themselves didn't give it away. I'm pulling it from the first gen Bronco V8. You know, the vehicle that we're all so excited to see revived. Sounds like you're all lathered up waiting on the OJ Bronco?

For sure. Hard to replace that sweet song the V8 sings.

Not disagreeing, I love a V8, but to be fair the current 3.5 EB 6 cylinder puts out more than double the horsepower and torque and trounces the V8 in fuel economy. And, while subjective, I'd argue is more reliable and durable. Eta - this is copied data and I believe the numbers then were...

Whoa man. Ease up. This is a public forum. Beside she's not so bad.

It looks too front heavy