no need to correct. i reference the limited information in my post. and i dont feel that i implied there should be a wider audience or and expanded options of price ranges. my concern is how the survey is constructed and what specific data can be pulled from it. the way questions and...
this is the part that bothers me. there arent any variable prices within the per question options that we have seen. its not trying to gather data on what customers are comfortable paying but what they are willing to pay. if i took the survey, balked at the sasquatch package for $5k, and chose...
i dont disagree with you. i have some experience/background in surveys, user polling, and user testing. i didnt get a survey and only saw the screenshots, but i didnt see anywhere for a user to provide text response to quantify their choices or other general comments. from what i know about...
i mean, if they wanted to get a feel for whether or not the pricing structure was good there would have been an option in those sections (or immediately after) to specify reasoning for the choice. all this does is reinforce the pricing they show. they can take it back to the board and say...
technically you arent giving them anything. they are making these by order. youre straight buying the components. i do agree that this is kinda high, though.
i mean, are we surprised at this point? after the complete site meltdown during reservation night and the access/deny for configuration information, i'm not really impressed with the ford web dev team.
did a search on that dashcam model name and found this:
https://us.thinkware.com/product-page/fa200d/
almost double what you can get direct from manufacturer. might want to do some research before loading up your cart at Ford Performance.