No, definitely one of those cars I missed after letting it go. Its close-ratio 5 speed manual and plasticky interior made it a terrible commuter when I started a new job and had to do 30 mile commuting daily.
I had a Colorado ZR2 Diesel, and all of its 180 HP managed to move that 4700 pound mass along just fine on the highway, merging or cruising. I'm not quite sure why all of a sudden the 2.3L is not sufficient enough to get the Bronco up to speed.
Congratulations on the purchase, I've never seen a 2016+ Tacoma configured as a crew cab with a long bed either so that is quite a find! The 2021 Tacoma Access Cab with the 6 speed manual is actually my backup choice if I bail on the Bronco.
I can believe they will deliver what they promise. I've had exceptional service and sales experience with Sewell's Audi dealer (My current car is the fourth car from this dealer). I've never had to fight over weird changes or trade-in values, and they've gone above and beyond doing free...
Ford will list those items as powertrain or exterior packages, not accessories. All of the parts on @NayNay 's list would be accessories that is tacked on, not replacing any existing parts of the vehicle.
I'm in the same situation as well. I don't want to order an EcoDiesel Rubicon because it'll only be available with the four door and it'll be close to $60K. A first-hand experience with the death wobble is also giving me pause for considering a solid front axle vehicle as a primary car.
I am...
Answer to what? I owe you nothing.
Why are you looking for some sort of validation from others on your purchase decision? You're the one making the payments on it, not them. Who cares what others think of what you buy.
Yep, I've learned the hard way with a Tundra. I'm basically looking at stock suspension/tire size Badlands with the 2.3L, so I don't think it's unrealistic to expect something like 16 city/20 highway.
Gas mileage would be really the only outstanding concern for me. I'm going with a two door (17 gallon tank), so it would have to be extremely bad fuel economy for me to consider backing out, something like 13 MPG city/16 MPG highway. It's going to be my only vehicle so I really can't accept...
The left corner of my 2016 Mustang C/S's rear bumper had some layering issues with the clearcoat, and resulted in needing to have it resprayed. I didn't mind it at the time because it allowed me to get the GT 350 rear valance/exhaust put on at a reduced cost.
You are likely correct, it should be an all-new model due to the new TNGA platform. The current 4Runner I believe has been on the same platform since 2009, so it's well overdue.
I would be more than happy to.
With Toyota's 'Kaizen' mentality, I would not expect major changes to the next generation 4Runner anyways. The company is not known for making heavy handed changes to their models from year to year, it's a series of continuous, low-key changes over the years.
Similar weight, aerodynamic profile and the same engine/transmission combination for those looking at the 2.3L/10 speed combo for their Broncos. This particular Ranger @TNcoupe drove had the same wheel and tire sizing as the Badlands trim, so at worst the Bronco would feel more responsive just...