Wouldn't this suggest that BRONCO is the well-established name, i.e., it will not be called the Ford Warthog? Their examples don't seem to backup their case: F-150 Lightning, MUSTANG Mach-e.
Having sat in both the MGV and power seats as a 6'4" human, I felt that the power seats had a lot more height adjustment in them. Never really got comfortable sitting in the manual seats.
The 12" screen and 360 degree camera are one of the most significant tech breakthroughs/features on the Bronco. Take the professional drivers at their word with respect to the capabilities of the 2.3 and get the high package.
It would be the high package right? Isn’t that where the front camera first comes in? Or do they mean you cannot have BOTH the camera and adaptive cruise?
Grand Cherokee. Two rows. Second row seats recline and have 38” of leg room and I’ve had grown men back there for 5+ hour trips. Basically same size as the Bronco but total length includes additional cargo room instead of the spare tire on the back. Both 12V and 110V power outlets, USB, etc. I...
Hard to say - I didn't tap on it, and they have a similar visual look (maybe one is "printed" and one is the actual wrap?) Given the slightly softer feel, I would think it would not have this type of response from tapping on it.
I took this picture of a door on the badlands in St. Louis. Both soft (and different patterns).
The dash had a soft/rubberized feel but was still some sort of plastic that flexed if you pushed it.
If you want the camera on the badlands, gotta add the high package. Difference will be the 360 camera/trail cams on Bronco v. front/rear on Rubicon. The feature is not available on the BD.
I sat in these same two Broncos. The leather seats, to me, are much nicer and were much more comfortable/easy to adjust. The leather had a nice firm, thick, “football” type feel.
The manual adjustment was not great. I also thought the MGV was “squishy” but I seem to be in the minority in that...