Well thats why that door sill looked so weird on the earlier teaser image. It's because it was a hole in the door. Not sure where you got that, but it looks legit.
So... I counted, twenty Ford Dealers in the KC Metro to choose from. @ChrispyKC or your alter ego, when it's time send me the link or tell me what dealer you're at please.
I guess I always just assumed that the hard top would be very similar to or exactly like a wrangler hard top. I never had a problem or issue with the wrangler hard top. Itās a pain to store, for sure, but I still think I like better than a soft top.
Looks like the same cactus grey from the last rear end teaser covered in dust to me. Right below the rear glass looks like a clean section Of cactus grey paint.
So do we think thatās a 35 or a 37 on the back?
But thatās the problem with the over priced Jeeps, because you can get a Ram 2500 with a 6.4 for less than $65k with front and rear lockers and a winch.
I think one thing to keep in mind here is that FCA has two 6.4 liter ā392āengines. Seems like most comments on their instagram post are assuming itās the SRT motor with 485hp and 475 lb/ft. This motor jacks the price up for everything itās shoe horned in. But what if they went with the Ram...
Iām looking for the equivalent of a rubicon with the 2.7tt, a 10 speed, leather, 12ā infotainment and 35s. $55k is what Iāve seen the wranglers priced at, and itās too much, but Iām guessing thatās what my build will hit.
A nice diesel JLUR/gladiator hits mid $60ks, so a JLUR with a 392 is most likely a $70k-ish Jeep that still needs a lift, and tires. Iām glad there are people out there who can afford that much for a wrangler, but I sure as hell cant.
I also wont pay $60k+ for a Bronco.