Search results

It's common knowledge that they are Wranglers. Ford had Goodyear make them Wranglers that don't say Wrangler on them for obvious reasons. I had Wranglers with Kevlar on my last two F150's and was not impressed. I now run Toyo AT's.. For the OP. Thanks for the thread.. I would like to see some...

32.1" tire and 3.73 gives you: 70 mph is 1749 rpm 80 mph is 1999 rpm 32.1" tire and 4.27 gives you: 70 mph is 2002 rpm 80 mph is 2288 rpm 32.6" and 4.46 gives you @ 70mph is 2059 rpm @ 80 rpm is 2354 rpm On Edit: I used the 10r80 ratios instead of the 10r60 but they are close enough...

Build and price for a Badlands with the 2.7 and 10 speed auto show 4.46 is included. 4.70 is optional with SAS. Manual tranny gives you 4.7 as the only option Outerbanks is 3.73 open diff is standard, 4.27 is optional. 4.7 comes with the manual

The "method" may be universal but that doesn't make it exactly accurate . Every vehicle has a different shape filler neck and if you put in fuel too fast it will shut the nozzle off prematurely. On top of that all pumps don't pump at the same rate so the pumps that pump faster will shut off...

I would like the fuel economy of the hybrid Maverick but the tow rating sucks... I only hope the hybrid Maverick has the same rating as the 2.7L Bronco

I am not so sure that the computer isn't more accurate. The computer knows how many times it turns each injector on per second. It also know the flow rate of each injector. Based on those it should be able to get an accurate fuel economy figure. When you fill up from the pump there's all kinds...

4 door doesn't have a short wheelbase..........

It sure wasn't the early 2000's when they started using SAE J2807 it was more like 2016 before the big three got on board with their trucks. If the Bronco had of been revealed before SAE J2807 it might have had a rating of 5000 lbs. I say put a heavier hitch on it and see how it handles. You...

I don't care for Tommy at all. He has to make a living working for Daddy... And the announcement about Jeep during a Bronco video was stupid

Mike @ 5Star has tuned many of my trucks and I have never had issues. He leaves all of Ford's safeguards in place. As soon as I got my '17 I put a Wagner CAC on it and a 5star tune. Tuning without an aftermarket CAC is a waste of money as when IAT2 gets hot it pulls timing in stock form.

I seriously doubt the Bronco has any kind of torque or power limiter for the first 1000 miles. After owning 2011, 2013, 2016 and now 2017 F150's with the ecoboost none of them had. Neither has my 2013, 2015, 2016 and now 2020 F350 Powerstroke. Also from my experience with these and many more...

Of course not- if Ford didn't make it, it wouldn't be a Bronco and I ain't driving no Jeep..... Now if Navistar brought back the IH Scout I would consider it..........

A ride along is stupid- let us drive them. When Ford first put the ecoboost in the F150 for the 2011 model year they had an event at the Texas Motor Speedway. I was able to drive them, drag race the competition and tow a cargo trailer. Let me drive one otherwise I am not ordering until I do

If it costs 4-5k extra over the 2.7 eco I will say no way unless the highway fuel economy is at least 5mpg over the 2.7 For that money they could sell a small diesel.

First of all it's not a high rpm engine. It delivers torque low down like a diesel. My 3.5 EB never sees 2k rpm unless I have the pedal down hard. Towing rpms also stay low like a diesel. When Ford added port injection that took care of the problems that it had with carbon build up. The engines...

I plan on ordering an OBX with the 3.73 and open diff for several reasons. One like you I don't plan on doing a lot or extreme offroad stuff- I have a Polaris XP Turbo for that. Second I have two Ford trucks and both have locking diffs. I have never had to engage either one. 4wd has always been...

Diesel for me.................

Before Ford added port injection to the 3.5 ecoboost there were problems with deposits. After a class action lawsuit Ford added port injection in 2017 to fix this issue. As far as premium goes I have towed 10-12k with my ecoboosts. When it's hot or towing is when you need to run premium so...

If you want the 2.7 just buy it, why make up some BS scenario where it works out on paper for you? If you "think" you might want more power than the 2.3 gives then you might also want more power than the 2.7 gives on low octane so just as well to plan on running premium in both. If you only run...

A few years back the EPA changed how they did their testing and since then the numbers have been more realistic. If those numbers ARE the official numbers then that's about what you can expect