Search results

My hardtop panel storage solution on the cheap. Next is to figure out a hoist for the large section. Not sure I'm going to worry about the doors for now.

Aww that sucks! If nobody else mentioned it, make sure you get that spare wheel checked it could be bent. (That happened to a friend's Jeep, he didn't notice until like two years later).

Using FillUp app to calculate and track actual mileage I have the following stats, Max: 19.05, Min: 14.41, and Average 16.66 mpg over a range of 6,859 miles. I've found the dash is approximately 5% optimistic compared to calculating MPG.

How was Anderson ford (Lincoln I assume)? Just curious as they wouldn't even discuss price or deals so I switched to Granger.

The back of the seat base occasionally feels a little narrow I feel like I'm sitting on the seat bottom bolsters, the front occasionally feels a little high as if it's tilted back slightly despite how I adjust it. They aren't uncomfortable, especially after a long drive, but they certainly...

For me it's occasionally that the width of the seat base is annoying. The power seats are a great upgrade from the manual everything (except windows) in my previous car.

99.9% happy here at ≈9200 miles. Had a minor valve cover leak fixed by warranty in 2 days, and while very comfortable and way more comfortable that other vehicles I've had, I've been slightly annoyed by the seat despite having power seats and almost infinite adjustability. 🤷‍♂️

Suddenly very glad I held off once i saw the price. Currently waiting to see what Rally Armor comes up with. http://www.rallyarmor.com/index.php/rally-mud-flaps-2021-ford-bronco-c-60_359

Not blown but mine has a valve cover leak, parts are on order.

I haven't tried to take mine to a stop but I have found that even with emergency braking assist turned off if a car in front is rapidly slowing to turn and the system thinks it might hit it, it'll dynamite the brakes with an "adaptive cruise" warning on the cluster. As much as I love the ACC...

Avg: 16.41 Min: 14.41 Max: 19.05 I use the app "FillUp" to track it and I've found that the dash display is 5-10% optimistic from actual calculated values. Driving behavior is 90% 2 lane highway ≈50 miles one way @ 65-70 mph. These numbers cover 5350 of my ≈8250 miles on the vehicle. Here...

I'd make a counter offer on the "right of first/last refusal" clause and change it to; they'll buy it back at market price minus some small percent, not the price you paid. Mostly because you're going to have Taxes, License, Insurance, and other cost sunk into it at minimum, plus any...

I'm pretty sure you forgot to carry something somewhere in your solution the, the answer is clearly 42.

Now that you mention it, cold acceleration into traffic was very jerky for the first ≈ 5000 miles or so. At almost 7000 this morning I didn't notice it at all, I wonder if it's a "learning" thing that just takes time.

I just crossed 6500 miles on my Badlands non sas, and for the last 2-3 tanks i've been seeing solid 17/18 calculated using Fillup phone app. Based on my data set the computer is ≈5-10% optimistic on mpg. Before that I was averaging about 15.5mpg during the same commute. So either they rolled...

If the light sensor is blocked it will think it is night time and either dim or switch to night mode (black background) so it's not as bright in a dark car. Glad you were able to resolve the issue.

Build Date: 21179 Miles: 5798 Seq: 120594 No issues so far *knocks on wood 🤷‍♂️

I left it at 99.9% just incase some pinhead bean counter somehow convinced production to use aluminum due to cost savings or something. 🤷‍♂️

I'm 99.9% sure this is bullshit as well, aluminum is far too soft.

I'd rather swap the 3.0 into my Badlands, those flares are hideous. They needed to put more work in on the body design to come close to looking as good as the F-150 Raptor.