Search results

lol look at the colors of the shadows underneath the car. Again its heavily filtered this is what it looks like without a filter.

that photo is the only photo of it that i have seen with that shade of candy like blue all the rest are a more subdued "blue jeans" color instead I believe mr levine touched that photo up with a saturation filter.

gonna take the risk with antimatter

no i mean legally. Im pretty sure the EPA would laugh a vehicle like that out of their office

im not sure you can sell a car with milage that bad in this class

first customer footage we have seen (really well shot too)

im talking about stuff that ford would not have noticed during testing or overlooked we all know how car manufacturing is , cant account for every failure not just that but small improvements , like just as an example the carpet on the back of the seats replaced with something waterproof

because im sick of covid and a bronco would allow me to escape all this bullshit

Ya im not even talking about huge stuff like new transmissions and engines and all that stuff im talking about little things like the rear seats being carpet instead of rubber fixes like that

Right but it seems like the my21 and my22 is really the same year but we are facing unprecedented demand and shortage from covid. Can we really expect major changes from the car itself in that short time frame? Or is ford going to prioritize just getting as many cars out there as possible and...

It seems that MY21 is going to be a "beta test" if you will and ford will receive massive amounts of feedback on the product from customers (including bad problems not caught during whatever testing they do) Based on the high speed rollout , can we expect MY 22 to have fixes to the first year...

would i have made this thread if i got any real answers other than HUR HUR DO MATH @lowmpg is an example of the help im looking for.

so its not going to snap the car suspension if im loaded to say 1100 or something?

trying to be polite when i say im fully aware that you have to add up weight this is not what im asking

this really doesnt help at all. Im asking experienced overlanders what their opinion is of the payload and if its doable or if its simply too small a payload for real overlanding trips

So im pretty much settled on the badlands 2.7 sas and i want to know if the small (982lb) payload is going to be a problem. I know that jeeps have similar payloads and they seem to be fine. Any overlanders out there want to give me some advice on this? im ordering the car pretty much without...

antimatter badlands 2.7 sas Im just worried the payload is going to be too small (982lbs) which would really bum me out since this is going to be sort of a retirement hobby for me and my dad (who is retiring) and we are going to do overlanding I just hope its capable in that department

could be wrong but i think the higher end nav is the built in maps that you have to pay for subscription style after the 3 year free trial is up

just want to warn you on that top photo , im almost positive they used some sort of instagram filter based on the color of the cky and other things. I have some other antimatter pictures but they are deep in my folder