I called and they said the same thing. But then the rep actually pulled up my VIN # and was surprised to see that I did have a build date on file (which is also 12/23).
Just spoke to a dealer who said the order bank won't allow them to input anything with a 2.7 auto. I just tried to order a non-reservation Base with the 2.7 and the dealer said they can't do it. Anyone else heard this???
Did some takeoffs of the 1966-1977 chrome "Sport" badge. Removed "SPORT" and tried out some different colors. I think these, coupled with shackles of the same color, would look fantastic. Whatcha think???
I believe the module gains 8% in hp and torque on the 2.3 and nearly 20% on the 2.7
An 8% increase on the 2.3 nets 324hp and 351 ft of torque. The stock 2.7 has 330 hp with 415 ft of torque. So the hp is very close but there is still a good amount of torque difference.
My thought is...if you...
Obviously. But I'm talking about performance. If you had 2 rigs built the same except one has the 2.7 and the other a 2.3 with a module..it appears the performance would be nearly identical.
Based on what I've read on the Panda module...it looks like the 2.3 version nets a HP increase of at least 8%. That puts it at 324hp. The stock 2.7 is rated at 330 HP. So for $600 or so the module turns the 2.3 into the 2.7 while giving you the option of manual or auto. Am I looking at that...
I have a 4 door Badsquatch AT with a build date of
I know what you mean but I ordered a 2nd Bronco today...partially for this very reason. My 4 door Badsquatch is currently set to build the week of 12/20. Today I ordered a 2nd rig...which is acutally the same setup as the one in OP's message...