Search results

https://www.automobile-catalog.com/make/ford_usa/bronco_1gen/bronco_1gen_wagon/1966.html Yeah, in 66, this thing wouldn’t qualify for a grocery run in today’s standards. 3200 lbs at 105 hp, that’s 30 lbs/hp. I haven’t read it all, so this may be base model. I guess no matter what engine it has...

Well I wanted to compare the old bronc, to the new one. Take the old best preforming Bronco engine option compared to what we think the best option the new bronc will have.

With those figures the Fox body is 15 lbs per HP, the new one is 9 lbs per HP. So that’s about 60% less weight per HP on the new mustang, and that should feel faster. Which I’m sure it has a better 1/4 mile time.

All this talk about the new engines of today putting out more power then years past, And how it out performs yesterday’s vehicles, I have to ask, what is the power to weight ratio? If your comparing it to a 20 year old vehicle or even older, those weight difference could be significant. I think...

Two door Fx4, SFA. Four door Raptor, IFS. Do you think this is how Ford will roll it out? If so, is it a deal breaker?

Please for the love of Christ don't force me to run black wheels - God I am so sick of black wheels. I would hate to have to buy new wheels and leave the black ones sitting on the ground here at work so I can drive the vehicle home. It's not 2009 and black wheels suck. This isn't a deal breaker...

Heres an idea, for those remote areas with no reliable internet, set up these Broncos to provide a free satellite WiFi service. The goal, to allow residents access to webMD. ??‍♂️

I do every time I refuse to give GMC my money. ?

Covid-19 quarantined, not. In for updates?

Yeah, I don’t like things binging in my ear. My phone don’t even bing less my family is call or texting. I think there is too much noise in the world. I will bypass anything especially the seat belt noise.

#1: Bronco SFA #2: Jeep #3: ? OR #1: Jeep #2: bronco SFA #3: ?

This all day. Working a rut, or needing to switch lines, having that R straight down from L would be EPIC. Personally I would not switch these two, it’s not natural having the R on a forward push to go backwards, plays with mind.

Ok, I see it, my eyes ain’t what they used to be. That 2.7 looks impressive. It don’t look like you’d experience any sudden bump in power. But there is the question that point OX1 made.

Ugh, all I see are a bunch of colored lines with no distinction between who’s who.

This is what I’m trying to figure out short of getting some test vehicles dirty. I expect the v8 to provide me a level of power early that it consistently growing but steady. I’m assuming the turbo will feel like a dirt bike with a power band, Im approaching something that needs a steady power...

Given the choices I went with brown. Would like a flat OD Green, I guess you could coat it with satin, makes it look flat.

I’d guess and say, the wolf track is the 2.7 ifs. While the Mtn. goat will get a v8 with SFA. But keep the names and brands accumulating, you know brands making brands. So it’ll be the Ford Bronco Shelby Wolf track 2.7 turbo. And the Ford Bronco Shelby gt500 Mnt. Goat V8 NA.

So it looks like the 2.7 and 3.5 are more sooted for low end torque. When compared to the coyote. Now the coyote was built for other benefits. But given the option between the two, you might think the 2.7 was the better option. But before I could conclude this, I’d also want to know about its...

You left your dog in what kind of kernel, auto correct, gets me every time. ?

My second point, maybe it’s because they can’t remember what to ask for, I mean when did brands make a brand that makes a brand then another brand. Does this make any sense? FORD makes MUSTANG, mustang makes MUSTANG (v6 model) MachE, GT, then mustang makes a SHELBY, then Shelby makes a Shelby...