Search results

Oh yeah, all permits applied for and received. If you look closely, you can see people enjoying the show from various areas. There is a series of videos he's done, but this is my fav.

If it's just bigger tires/wheels and different suspension parts, that should be a reasonably priced upgrade. We shouldn't be looking at $75k to get this model.

Too many people thinkin' they will be doing this stuff...

Any audio report - typical Eco-boost sound or V8?

Upside is customers want them (including Jeep customers, who have been begging for years and because of the Bronco, Jeep is apparently developing one), and they're more durable and easier to work on. If you want to compete with Jeep and Jeep is working on one... On the other hand, I have seen...

All I know is that tire/fender gap - if you're truly interested in competing with the Wrangler Rubicon - should be standard on (at least) the Badlands. My Rubicon has a big gap, and when flexing, it can utilize every inch of space. It ain't for looks.

While this test and the discussion comparing the new Bronco to the Wrangler is fair, given the trim and option levels, the Bronco is clearly meant as an all-around off-roader. The Jeep Wrangler Rubicon (which I own) is designed specifically for rock crawling. The Rubicon SHOULD do better on the...

I personally find the Bronco R styling more attractive than the retro production Bronco. If they morphed the R shape into the Bronco Raptor, it would sell BIGTIME.

Maybe it's me, but there doesn't seem to be much distance between the fender flares and upper tire, indicating limited suspension travel space. Looks odd for an off-road inspired vehicle.

It's pretty easy to see the Territory MT is not a true mud tire. It has siping and is M+S rated, which is one step below the "severe snow" rating. Mud tires are notoriously bad in the snow and ice. It's clearly an aggressive all-terrain tire, which for all around use, is better anyway. No true...