They don't work as good as the originals. Tried adding one and the vent doesn't seal as well as the original factory versions. They have to make the hole loser in order for a person (not a machine) to be able to pop them in.
The nozzles do a good job at replacing the unholly contraptions cans...
Interesting that you consider a person speaking facts to be "that guy".
And I never disputed that the Bronco2/Ranger were twins. Simply stated correctly that the Bronco itself was not a twin of nor connected in anyway to the Ranger.
I also have no heartburn with the Bronco 2 at all for...
The Bronco was never a "twin" of the Ranger. The Bronco II was as much a real Bronco as the current Bronco Sport is. The Early Bronco had its own specific chassis. Though did share some interior bits with the Mustang
The 78/79s were based on the F100 chassis and the rest were all F150 based,
Bronco pickup should be based on a 2 door. Give it a half cab like the Early Bronco and rear seat delete.
Not some 4 door abomination
It could even be a DIY replacement roof/back wall kit an owner buys from the dealer.
It wasn't law suits...it was a Federal mandate from the EPA that changed gas cans.
And having to add things to return functionality to a product means that product is no longer functional in its present as sold form. Outside of narrow uses the new nozzles spill more gas than the old cans ever did.
So the figures (as most things CA .gov puts out) are fabricated BS.
Aside from the costs to the manufacturer for the materials and construction, there WILL be the mandated testing procedures the State will require the tire companies to foot the bill for to get their approval (just as CA...
News Flash....EVERYTHING is carcinogenic (or out right fatal) with enough exposure.
The world is trying to kill us and no one gets out alive.
But hey if you are happy in your nanny state padded cage good for you.