Search results

For me, 8 months, 15k miles. Just a representation of being used with many cycles for the brake, turn, and tail lights while still functioning properly. Another 8 months and they'll have about matched my failed Oracle lifespan. 😂

Update: Cheap China tails are still working perfectly nearly 15,000 miles later! Although the initial low price seems to be in the $150 range now.

It's just suspended from the inside of the roof as shown in the pictures. You can see more pictures of it in the link I posted. I've also hooked it up to a bungee cord that stretches from the soft top folding mechanism across the top. Anyway, back to tires... Not my fault that Headsong is...

Well, it's not a sticker. I've moved it around quite a bit, and pretty much only use it leading up to Christmas. :) https://www.bronco6g.com/forum/threads/eruption-green-bronco-club.22236/page-243#post-2407145

I've got over 50,000 miles on my Nokian Outpost nAT in 285 70 17. They've been a fantastic tire in nearly all conditions and I'll likely put them on again when they're worn out. I feel like they aren't great in 2wd in the wet (my Bronco doesn't have 4A), but that's my only gripe.

Wasn't me! But reading the discussion here highlights some common things many of us tend to think about bikers vs drivers. Each of us has a unique perspective based on our individual experiences, and it's difficult to understand another perspective that may contradict those personal incidents...

Far from useless... I'm in Chicago, and my Bronco is a softop. 45000 miles and it stays outside 365 days a year. In the winter, I make Costco trips, load my 4 Aussies in the back, load in suitcases, and work stuff. The back gate opens just fine. If I need to go higher than the bottom of the...

Owner's Manual states not to lift the back cargo area portion of the soft top when temps are near freezing or below. This is because the plastic windows need to flex and fold when opening the cargo area. When cold, they will become stiff and brittle. Some dealers may deny warranty, and others...

Agreed, the Oracle design is my favorite too. I just couldn't handle the ongoing issues and despite the extended warranty, lack of confidence that they'd last. I've got a 26 year old TransAm and hate the lighting at night, but I don't drive it much after dark. LED upgrades would be great for...

Could be something to do with the resistors needed for the halogen replacements. I suspect there are more halogen owners who "upgraded" to Oracles since many of the Signature lighting LED owners are mostly satisfied with their OEM upgraded LEDs from Ford.

Right? It's not as if any of the name brand lights are hand-crafted by Amish folks in rural Pennsylvania! 🤣

Just an early 2 month update: No issues so far through Chicago cold, snow, ice, and salt spray. They just work like they should, even though they only cost $69 instead of $500. Amazing... LOL If they fail prematurely and I have to get another set for $70ish, it's still a better value than...

To their credit, Oracle did send me a new driver side light for free under their new 2 year warranty program, and I did NOT have to return my failed driver light. Hopefully it lasts and the passenger side one doesn't go out. Or perhaps they both go out before May 2026 so I can get another set...

I fully believe your '88 Mustang had a TOP speed of 130mph. But to hit a near 130 mph quarter mile TRAP speed that was referenced, it would take considerable modifications to the entire powertrain and suspension. The 2.7 Broncos are about the same in the quarter mile as a stock 1988 5.0 as...

Finally finished my outdoor house decorations for Christmas!

C/D TEST RESULTS for AMG EQS 60 mph: 3.0 sec 100 mph: 7.6 sec 1/4-Mile: 11.4 sec @ 119 mph 130 mph: 14.5 sec 150 mph: 22.3 sec Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.2 sec. Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 3.3 sec Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 1.3 sec Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 1.8 sec Top Speed (gov ltd): 154 mph...

Indeed, the braking and roadholding of the Rivian are even better than the Ford Explorer ST, Ford's Performance SUV that is far lighter. Not sure how anyone can call that "horrible" besides someone that just wants to argue for the sake of it... C/D TEST RESULTS for 2025 Explorer ST 60 mph: 5.1...

If the budget allowed and with some lottery money, it'd be a nice addition to the fleet! Certainly a capable and excessive beast!

I'm kind of partial to the cargo area silhouette! 😉