I understand. However, Ford should have dictated they could not be sold with an ADM.Ford dictated to us the demos we got, not the other way around.
Where is the common decency in this program!
Sponsored
I understand. However, Ford should have dictated they could not be sold with an ADM.Ford dictated to us the demos we got, not the other way around.
Exactly. Back when it was figured Nov or Dec for my order, sold my truck. Then I find out its pushed to 2022. I'm thinking ok, maybe by March or April. Now this allocation crap, I'm wondering if even 2022, or is it pushed to 23, which I believe will happen to many 2 door reservation holders.I guess those of us without vin's have to ask ourselves if this means that this could go into 2023 with ford not completing the initial orders from 2021 even in the second year- for me sadly i can't wait that long and i think a lot of us will sadly be forced to jump ship after all this invested time- oh well
Ford can't dictate to us pricing. Dealers set the pricing. I know everyone laments ADM, but it's more nuanced than most people realize. I'm not going comment further on it in this thread, for fear of derailing it further.I understand. However, Ford should have dictated they could not be sold with an ADM.
Where is the common decency in this program!
I'm not an "early" reservation holder, but if that's their assumption in my case they will be be wrong. I'm sorry but no vehicle is worth this kind of cr@p....Ford knows that very few early reservers will cancel so why do they care about your thoughts on how they will do things?
The 60/40 IS their planned ratio. They are running 2 shifts now. They work Saturdays and word is right now many employees are working 12 hour shifts. There was talk of adding a 3rd shift but they can't get people hired and the learning curve for training....puts a 3rd shift idea out the window.I would simply like to see Ford significantly increase MAP production for the Bronco. Sixty percent or higher Bronco to 40% or lower Ranger. A second shift and some weekend hours. More Broncos being built might help everyone. If that is the case, I hope Ford tells us via email.
If this didn't make business sense Ford wouldn't do it. It feels like a lot of people act as if the customers that big dealers sell to are somehow less of a customer than the ones that small dealers sell to. The big dealers are satisfying a ton of customers, many of which have reservations. This equation in no way shows that reservation holders are getting screwed. If you shifted the equation in a small dealers favor is there not a chance that you are now screwing over a reservation holder at a big dealer? At the end of the day the constraints are going to have a much bigger effect when a reservation holder gets their vehicle than this allocations system.The whole "dealers who sell more should get more Broncos" argument is dumb when there's a reservation/ordering system in place. You could use this same logic to say "well big dealers should have had more reservations/orders therefore why not just do it by reservation/order numbers"
If big dealers couldn't entice people to place orders with them, then that's their own fault.
The reality is that the big dealers whined that this was unfair because they didn't want to actually have to be competitive. And Ford rolled over. It has nothing to do with Ford trying to work through shipping/logistics issues...
Their whole launch,and reservation system and communications shows their incompetence.If there are still constraints and/or slowdowns in production (and I assume there will be), it gets even uglier.
Ford could allay these concerns with effective communication to reservation holders. But they have been brutally incompetent on that score.
You are 100% correct. Ford is forgetting their dealers need customers.Ford's customers are the dealers, through their franchise agreements. We buyers are the dealers customers, and Ford does not forget that.
Bro, we been bitching for 14 months straight...Y'all are fuc%$#@ crazy, you do know that right? You have been bitcH^%$ for 17 hours straight.
Or many people who ordered from small dealers that won't see any allocated to them.Yes, 9 pages of people complaining because they decided to go to numerous small dealers offering a steep discount on 6G and wondering why they wont get their Bronco. Deja vu all over again. (Besides you 2 door folks - You got screwed by Ford.)
Please don’t read too much in to this personally, but it seems like pure bullshit. If big dealers sold more Broncos through the reservation system, then they would get more Broncos. No complex formula needed.I've tried to explain this before, but it seems to fall on deaf ears around here.
Allocation does not equal build sequence.
Production has to be divvied out. Shouldn't the dealers who sell more cars (and by extension, usually have more reservations) get more of the overall production? There will be some outliers (like Granger) who sell less cars, but have large reservation numbers. I believe this to be a small number of dealers. Product distribution is not easy when you have 3300+ dealers across the country. I'm sure that this allocation formula is a balancing act to make sure that there aren't shipping bottlenecks or large swaths of customers waiting, and so the flow out of the factory is as fast as possible.
Nothing has changed. Ford is still going to build roughly in order of reservation. As I've said from the very beginning, commodity constraints will have the biggest effect on production sequence!
*EDIT:
I've said it before and I will say it again. I applaud Ford for using a reservation system. While it was ambitious, it largely curbed dealer markups to this point. Many people on here are getting caught up in the distribution, but this system is far better than the alternative.
It sounds like your logic is this: I told you the system is flawed, so those of you that are damaged by the flaws in a greatly disproportionate way should stop complaining about the flaws because I've been telling you it's flawed. Personally, I'd rather see the flaws addressed as opposed to the idea of accepting them.I've tried to explain this before, but it seems to fall on deaf ears around here.
Allocation does not equal build sequence.
Production has to be divvied out. Shouldn't the dealers who sell more cars (and by extension, usually have more reservations) get more of the overall production? There will be some outliers (like Granger) who sell less cars, but have large reservation numbers. I believe this to be a small number of dealers. Product distribution is not easy when you have 3300+ dealers across the country. I'm sure that this allocation formula is a balancing act to make sure that there aren't shipping bottlenecks or large swaths of customers waiting, and so the flow out of the factory is as fast as possible.
Nothing has changed. Ford is still going to build roughly in order of reservation. As I've said from the very beginning, commodity constraints will have the biggest effect on production sequence!
*EDIT:
I've said it before and I will say it again. I applaud Ford for using a reservation system. While it was ambitious, it largely curbed dealer markups to this point. Many people on here are getting caught up in the distribution, but this system is far better than the alternative.